Visual Culture of Slavery

Today’s New York Times includes an editorial calling for a Slavery Monument.  Seems overdue to me.  Is there any space left on the National Mall?  In this moment of deep racial and cross-religious tensions and anxiety, I like the way visual culture invites us to reflect and reframe without panic and distraught emotion.

The Wadsworth Atheneum, its glorious renovation completed, now has an concise and engaging exhibition Sound and Sense: Poetic Musings in American Art.  Every object can be inhaled slowly and thoroughly.

2015-12-05 13.23.59

I was taken with the first Clementine Hunter painting I had seen in years.  Hunter, born just after the Civil War to a sharecropper family, began working the fields at age 12 on a Louisiana plantation called Melrose.  As an older woman, she moved indoors to work as a cook, and that’s when she found discarded art supplies left behind by a plantation visitor.  An artist was born.  “Cotton Picking” from around 1940 tells a direct, unexaggerated story of the poor, black life Hunter knew so well.

2015-12-05 13.23.59Here’s a close up of how she created the cotton balls–a thumb smudge of paint, repeated over and over.  Or maybe she dolloped a blob from the paint tube.  The texture energizes the surface, contrasting the rest of the flatly-depicted scene.

Hunter’s paintings caught the eye of local ‘white ladies’ who paid Hunter a pittance for the works, then turned around and sold them to ‘folk art’ collectors for a healthy upcharge.  Of course, Hunter never received any of these profits.  Because collectors bought the paintings, some have landed in museums like the Wadsworth.

I first met Hunter’s works while visiting Melrose, which markets her, her story, and her paintings as a major tourist draw.  In 1955, when she was 68, Hunter painted her African House Murals on plywood.  The murals were then hung in the African House at the plantation.  She still very much lives through these visceral works.  Go see them if you can.

At the Wadsworth, I also was captivated by William Howard’s desk.  He built the desk during the Mississippi Reconstruction, about 1870, from inexpensive yellow pine and salvaged crate wood.  He hand-carved the desk front, honoring the tools associated with his own history as a slave.

You can probably make out the pistol at center and the pointing hand, as if showing how the work got done–under duress.  You can also see the tableware he created, first for plantation owners, then for freed African Americans.

Screen Shot 2015-12-06 at 4.59.41 PM

As with Hunter, Howard must have been self-taught, leaving us with this top-heavy work desk that’s completely distinctive.  The desk, just like Hunter’s painting, tells a story of slavery and freedom, through a quirky creativity and vision.

What a good reminder for us today, to think beyond the fear and foolishness, to rise above the pain of our histories and present, and to actively work to create a world of new possibilities.

By the Sea

This summer, three Connecticut museums are featuring maritime-themed exhibits, totally unplanned but wonderfully summerish and coincidental.  Today, I had the pleasure of joining one of the curators, Ben Colman, at the Florence Griswold Museum.  You know how much I love to dig into paintings, so I’ll share a few stories here.

This show features paintings from the permanent collection, but predominantly from the Museum of the City of New York, one of my old stomping grounds (where I worked with the Currier & Ives collection).   Ben shared that these paintings give us a window into attitudes toward nature and human-made landmarks, ironic perhaps in paintings about the sea.  First, almost all the paintings celebrate the new technology of steam sailing, whether as a paddlewheeler, ferry, or steamer.

By 1827, about 20 years after steam-powered shipping changed New York forever, the competition was fierce, both for business and the tourist trade.  Steam ship lines were competitive and needed something sexy to attract customers away from rivals.  You gotta love James Alexander Stevens who created an on-board art gallery, long before galleries and museums ever existed in America.

Basically, he commissioned 12 paintings on panels (apparently sturdier than canvas and could withstand rough sailing) for the main cabin of the Albany.  These panels would inform passengers of key sites along the way up the Hudson that they wouldn’t want to miss.  An early, graphical tour map, if you will.

Not-yet-famous Thomas Cole contributed, as did Thomas Birch, with two surviving panels in this show.  Awesome.  In this View of New York Harbor from the Battery from 1827, you might make out Staten Island, Sandy Hook, and Castle Garden at the entrance to the harbor, sites passengers would have seen as well.

2015-07-16 16.08.00

Lots of sailing ships.  Maybe you can just make out the steamer in the rear.  The future is coming.

How much fun the oddball sites are, too, where today, we go, “huh?”  Like Youle’s Shot Tower by Jasper Cropsey, known for his luminous landscapes, but here a darker, early work from 1844.

IMG_1177

 

What the heck is a shot tower?  Well, this would have been one of the tallest landmarks around, so was quite notable.  A screen would have been placed at the top of the tower, 175 feet high, then molten lead poured through the screen.  The lead would drip through the screen (yes, really), and those drips would then fall 175 feet (yes, really).  By the time they landed, gravity and force would have shaped the lead into shot, or bullets.  Shot towers were essential for early defense.

Here’s the backstory, as if that wasn’t enough of one, that I love.  Cropsey and his colleagues would have gotten their training in Europe, often on what was called a Grand Tour, visiting key sites and for artists, studying in ateliers in Paris and beyond.  Romanticism was the fashionable style, and artists searched for the poetic, the moody, the mysterious, the intense feelings.  In Europe, this meant castles, ruins, historical subjects.

Well, the “wild west” of the American art scene didn’t have any castles.  The shot tower would have been a close substitute.  Note Cropsey’s moody lighting and rich color scheme, evoking a sense of grandeur for what would have been a recognizable necessity, but not particularly an structure of architectural repute.  Fun, eh?

I also like Michael John Boog’s Hell Gate from 1888.

Hell Gate

There’s a lot going on in this painting.  First, note the triangular tower in the mid-ground left.  That’s an arc tower.  In an early form of electric lighting, the tower was built in 1884 for arc lights, which put out incredibly bright beams from each of nine arcs, acting like a lighthouse.  Only problem, the beam was blinding.  Geez.  Substitute one problem for another.

So why do you need a lighthouse-type arc tower there in the middle of that placid scene?  Because it took two dynamite blasts to get it that way.  Talk about your tourist attraction.  Apparently 100,000 turned out to watch the confluence of three bodies of water get dynamited into submission.  Known as a serious sailing hazard since the 1600s, the point where the Harlem and East Rivers converge with Long Island Sound created whirlpools that deviled sailors.  The Dutch word for whirlpool apparently sounds a lot like what the English eventually called it, “Hell’s Gate.”

By the 19th century, sailing was central to moving New York’s economy, and dangers couldn’t be tolerated.  One blast apparently calmed things down, and a second worked on removing the rocks underneath.  This painting shows the view from the Queens side, post blasts, looking at the remaining rock outcropping.  Fisherman might have been the only sailors to complain, as the bass apparently were gone with the booms.

Lest you think sailing was all fun and wondrous sites, there was steerage then, too, particularly for the 200 or so passengers who would endure cramped quarters below for 41 days on a packet ship crossing the Atlantic.  Packet ships carried packages and people, notably from Old Lyme, CT through New York, to London, on a regular schedule.  Sixty affluent passengers could have a state room, but as John Rolph shows in this engraving from 1851, most people would escape the hole for fresh air on deck.

2015-07-16 16.09.22

How much easier daily marine life was for the fisherfolk.  I love this elegant, c1845 painting by Victor Audobon, son of John James, who painting with the same bravura as the Hudson River School, but was never one of the club.  See that same sweep of landscape, dwarfing people as they scuttle about their daily business, here wrestling with fish.  Ah the sea, land, and sky.  Perfect for a summer reverie.  Can’t you just smell it?

 

 

 

Off the Wall with Color

Julie and I postponed our trip to Storm King because of the rainy weather, so we stayed in Connecticut to visit The Bruce and Aldridge museums.

Hans Hoffman, Mosaic Mural, 1956

Hans Hoffman, Awakening, 1947

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bruce features a voluptuous exhibit on Hans Hoffman right now, where you can scoop the paint and eat it right off the canvas.

Gabriel Schachinger, Sweet Reflections, 1886

Oh, that might be Gluttony, one of the seven deadly sins not being shown at the Bruce (seven regional museums are tackling the sins).

There, it’s Pride.  In a tightly curated show of prints and paintings from the last 500 years, Pride is dissected in ways you may not have thought about before–not just pride in the body, but pride in landscape, drawing in the hubris of ‘man over nature’.  And the vanitas of pride about possessions–you can’t take it with you.

How is the story of Adam and Eve about pride?  The Bruce attempts to make sense of that.

 

The Aldridge features several contemporary artists making site-specific installations, including the works that inspired their own creations.

My favorite came from B. Wurtz.

The quotidian.  Three walls of aluminum cooking pans that he has painted.  Turn a pan over, and you may notice the stamped-in pattern on the bottom.  B. Wurtz has painted the pattern in acrylic, then arranged the pans on the wall.  You can get a sense from the above.  I was mesmerized.

Like Hoffman, we have color leaping off the wall…with very pleasing patterns, replicated without repeating, along the huge open space of the gallery.  Love it!

Turkish artist Elif Uras now lives and works in New York.  She brings traditional Turkish pottery-making methods to contemporary subjects in funny ways.  We have the reference to ancient Greek red-and-black pottery with the style and its figures.  But instead of fighting the Trojan war, they are vacuuming or talking on the phone.

Screen Shot 2015-06-28 at 7.44.56 PMScreen Shot 2015-06-28 at 7.45.14 PM

Gorgeous technique, with in-this-moment social commentary.  Just like those Greeks, the ancient enemy of the Turks.  And she celebrates women–women’s labor, women’s form, and women’s artistry.  A must see.

In the salute to Off the Wall is Virginia Poundstone.  Flowers are clearly one of the most popular art subjects ever.  But you’re not likely to see a mammoth flower coming off the way quite so literally as it does in its two-story incarnation at the Aldridge right now.

2015-06-28 16.04.52

 

Color coming off the wall?  Not bad for a drab day!

 

 

 

Politics and painting, and so much more

George Caleb Bingham, Jolly Flatboatmen, 1846

George Caleb Bingham, a mid-19th-century, self-taught American artist, was also a state senator from the new state of Missouri.  His wonderful “Jolly Flatboatman” can be read as a political document.  Bingham advocated for Congressional funding to develop the Mississippi River.  See, the river was wild, and in order to access all those western resources, the river needed to be ‘improved’.  Man over Nature, and all that.

So here we see a placid, wide Mississippi River and a boat sailing easily into a future full of riches in them thar hills.  These men don’t have to work hard, as if the West wasn’t quite as dangerous as Eastern investors feared.  Everyone could dance for joy.  That is, if the river was cleared and re-routed as needed.

Landscape, Rural Scenery, 1845

What the current show at the Met also shows is the development of an artist.  His early awkward scenes, like this one, show his lack of training.  Here, we see its monstrous Hudson-River-School-inspired plants and trees dominating the scene all out of proportion and the blatant use of red to draw our eye to…a piece of laundry.  Hmmm.

But in that same year of 1845, Bingham begins his remarkable series of Mississippi and Missouri River scenes and becomes an art star in the Art Union, putting reproduction prints in the hands of the middle class everywhere.

The exhibit also demonstrates his method, which starts with intricate drawings until he gets the face and pose just right.  Then he lines up the drawing and his canvas to accomplish his planned composition and basically retraces his drawing until it transfers to the canvas.  At least, that’s the sense I could make of the description on the wall label.

2015-06-22 15.53.02

2015-06-22 15.53.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He also could make a drawing on one side of a thin page (as above), put it by a window, and in its light, trace the reverse, to voila, reuse the pose in another work.

2015-06-22 15.58.18

Storyteller, study, possibly 1849

2015-06-22 15.51.53

Wood boatman, 1850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015-06-22 16.04.19

Skillet-beater, 1857

 

I was mesmerized by the beauty of these drawings, so much more subtle and sophisticated than his paintings full of types.  The curators explain this, too.  The Bingham brand sold better, especially in the eastern U.S. and Europe, with these rougher types.

He reused favorite characters and compositions again and again.  Like Gilbert Stuart and his portrait of George Washington, these were Bingham’s dollar bills.

My favorite painting in the show is just such a recycled character, “Mississippi Boatman” from 1850.  Note the much better use of attention-grabbing red, now drawing our eye to this riverman’s grizzled features.  I’d love to break bread with this man, since he clearly has seen a thing or two.

Taxpayer dollars rescued (as in purchased) the discovered drawings, now lent to this exhibit by “The People of Missouri.”  Bingham, who served these same people, would surely approve.

Theresa Bernstein

A new essay from the “Finding Her Way” series in Art Times Journal has now been published.  Feel free to spread the word!

st

Theresa F. Bernstein, In the Elevated, 1916 Oil on canvas,
30 x 40 in. The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase,                 American Art Trust Fund, 2011.2                                                                                   
ART TIMES JOURNAL Summer 2015

A watery day

2015-04-26 14.31.45On a blustery spring day, I visited the charming Colonial town of Essex, CT.  I started at the delightful Connecticut River Museum, celebrating all things about that river.  I had always heard it was terrific.  No understatement!

While I’ll share my favorite part in a moment, the American history that touched the riverbank at Essex makes the museum worth a visit.  In the Revolutionary War, Connecticut’s war ship (all 13 colonies were asked to build one), the Oliver Cromwell, was built here in 1776.  An 1814 skirmish with the British, part of the War of 1812, was likened to Pearl Harbor for its surprise and devastation.  At the unmanned fort, 27 ships were burned, and the town’s economy was blasted apart.

Artist rendition of how the Turtle worked

But, oh boy!  The best part was climbing into a replica of the first submarine, called the American Turtle.  Now this thing is small.  I can tell you because I smacked my head on it getting in.  Ouch!  2015-04-26 14.41.53

The idea was to take a bomb in the submarine and hook it to the bottom of a British war ship, and bye bye ship.  Well the submarine worked – the propeller was a huge innovation.  The bomb was ready.  But drilling through the submarine to attach the bomb to the warship hull, not so much.  So even though Yale graduate David Bushnell made a great case to Benjamin Franklin and made three attempts, the submarine was scuttled and the original eventually lost.

Two replicas at the museum were built off detailed plans that survive.  Climbing inside — it’s worth the price of admission.

2015-04-26 14.45.02

I also really enjoyed the special exhibit on Connecticut artists working under the Works Progress Administration in the 1930s.  The pieces are small enough that maybe they served as studies for the ultimately larger works, like murals in post offices and schools.

You know I want to know all about women artists and women’s lifestyles.  Here’s a glimpse from this exhibit.

Haddam, Looking East, Cornelia Vetter

Cornelia Vetter, Haddam, Looking East, n.d.

At nearby Haddam, Cornelia Vetter began working for the government arts project after her husband died in 1933.  She did 18 paintings for the Federal Arts Project.

Grading the Tobacco, Harold Barbour, 1938

Harold Barbour, Grading the Tobacco, 1938

Harold Barbour painted a series of watercolors, on work in the tobacco barns.  Here, woman work in the sorting shop.  After the tobacco leaves cure in the hanging shed, the leaves are sorted into grades.  During the Depression, sorting and transplanting, as seen below, proved to be great jobs for women.

Transplanting, Harold Barbour, 1938

Harold Barbour, Transplanting, 1938

Look at this beautiful charcoal.

Tuna Boat, Beatrice Cuming

Beatrice Cuming, Tuna Boat, n.d.

So many women artists to discover and enjoy.

 

Then I strolled down the street, from the gem of the little museum to the country’s oldest, continually operating inn, open 239 years.  The 33-room Griswold Inn was build in 1776, a busy year in busy Essex.

Inns were central to Colonial and early Federal life, and the Boston Post Road was essential for information flow between New York and Boston.  How did information flow?  Over the communal tables at inns like the Griswold.  We all sat around one such table to hear the owner Geoff Paul tell great stories about the art collection in the inn.

Owner Geoff Paul, an enthusiastic speaker

Owner Geoff Paul, an enthusiastic speaker

Geoff spoke about the origins of the steam-powered ship in Connecticut, long before Robert Fulton, and the intricacies of ship portraits, that owners were pickier about than paintings of their wives.

Like a good art historian, Geoff taught us what makes a great marine painting.  Flags show the wind, so create movement; the more flags the merrier (and more expensive).  Angling a boat toward the viewer enhances that sense of power.  Geoff favors works made at the time the ship sailed, not nostalgic works painted later.  Paintings of the moment often are celebrations of American ingenuity and prowess and could be coupled with the Brooklyn Bridge or highlight new installations of electricity–other technological marvels that allowed ‘man’ to get the sense of ‘triumphing over nature’.

The Connecticut

Antonio Jacobsen, The Connecticut, n.d. c 1880s

And steamships, Geoff pointed out, represented the birth of the cruise ship industry, providing pleasure outings for the Connecticut middle class.  Board the City of Hartford steamer in that city, steam overnight, spend the day in New York, before returning with another overnight ride.

Once, when a steamer hit a part of a bridge that wasn’t made to open en route, maritime law changed, requiring all bridges to have red lights as markers, distinct from lights on shore.  No one was hurt, so the happy ending was that the passengers got to spend the night nearby and see a show at the Goodspeed Opera House, also written about in this blog.  Plenty of other steamer accidents were deadly, borne of races and other mishaps, leading to the founding of the Coast Guard for monitoring and rescue.

Who wouldn’t love the mural that, when the switch is flipped, rocks like the waves on the Connecticut River?  Apparently drunks, that’s who.  They’re not too fond of a suddenly rolling room.  It’s a really ingenious feature that came with this 1960s mural.

Yes, this mural actually rocks back and forth, like waves

Yes, this mural actually rocks back and forth, like waves

You can probably make out the wake at the center.  This perspective puts us on the back of a steamer, viewing our own trailing wake in the wide river.  What fun this whole experience is!

The Inn also has a fragrant, evocative taproom–a busy place on Sunday afternoon.  And then, there’s this room.

It’s another Wow, in a day full of them.  Hung truly salon style, the paintings and ephemera jam every inch of wall and ceiling space of the Bridge Room.  My most favorite were the posters of the women fighting for Temperance.  Starting in the 1820s, women advocated against the reckless drinking that was notoriously tearing up families in the young country.  Recognizing that total abstinence could be difficult when both religion and medicines used alcohol, the petitioners sought moderation.

Great Sots Temperance - cleaned up and frameless

The women marched.  The inn keepers agreed.  Men signed the pledge to take care of their families and stop drinking to excess.  If a man signed his name with a T, then he pledged total abstinence, or to become a T-totaller.  I always thought it was tea-totaller, as in being a tea v alcohol drinker.  Geoff tells otherwise.

Of course, these women went on to fight slavery and advocate for the vote.  Get this.  As late as 1969, women could not stand at a bar in Connecticut.  Yes, really.  So a woman, yet another protester, came in demanding to be served.  In cahoots with the innkeepers, she demanded her arrest.  The case went to the Connecticut Supreme Court in Griswold Inn v State of Connecticut, and the Inn won!

Geoff made clear that the Inn relies on drinking for its sustenance.  And Prohibition didn’t stand in the way.  It is located right on the river.  Sailors knew how to navigate in the dark.  The inn did just fine during those years.   About fifteen years ago, when renovations were being done in the library, Geoff finally learned where at least some of that rum was hidden.  In the ceiling of the library was an 8′ long copper container.  In the ceiling!

Don’t ever be shy about looking up in historic places.  Who knows what you’ll find?

Looking up at a beautiful fan window on Main Street in Essex

Looking up at a beautiful fan window on Main Street in Essex

Up and Down

Reginald Marsh, "Wooden Horses" [detail], 1936, tempera on board; 24 x 40 inches, Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, The Dorothy Clark Archibald and Thomas L. Archibald Fund, The Krieble Family Fund for American Art, The American Paintings Purchase Fund, and The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 2013.1.1. "Coney Island: Visions of an American Dreamland, 1861-2008"

With two exhibits and an entire museum, I’ve been thinking a lot about carousels.  Yes, the Wadsworth Atheneum has its Coney Island exhibit mounted, the same one I worked on 15 months ago.  And the Yale School of Art has the “Side ShowScreen Shot 2015-04-06 at 3.43.02 PM” exhibit, as a literal side show about the freaky side of the carnival.  In the Reginald Marsh painting from the Wadsworth, the women seem be deadly serious about racing to the finish line, beating out the man in the red bowler.  No simple up and down ride for them.

I learned at the New England Carousel Museum in Bristol, CT that carousels didn’t even go up and down until 1907.  In fact, carousels started as a training tool for knights.  Um, yes, medieval knights.  They would practice spearing rings with lances.

Maybe you’ve ridden a carousel where you tried to snare a ring.  In the Golden Age of carousels, that is the 19th century, that’s where we got the idea of “grabbing the brass ring.”  A winner on the carousel, and in life, grabs the brass ring.  But liability put a stop to that.  Now we have to be content riding up and down.  No killer scenes like Marsh gives us.

Who knew there are different styles of carousel horses?  The first permanent park carousel was in Philadelphia, and the Phily style is oh so graceful.  Moreso than the solid and chunky Country Fair style.  And then there’s the Coney Island style, showy and pretty.

2015-04-04 16.00.18The menagerie animals are great fun.  Hard to believe they fell out of favor for the more popular horse carousel.  Who wouldn’t want to ride a rooster, a giraffe (who’s eyes follow you no matter where you move), a tiger, a hare, or a camel?  If not a horse, then why not a zebra or a seahorse?

 

2015-04-04 16.07.17

 

 

 

 

The horses are completely wonderful, too.  I’ve never seen a three-dimensional carved flower on a carousel horse before.  Tres elegant!

 

2015-04-04 15.58.36

 

 

Or what about a bulldog or a leprachaun, hidden under the saddle?

 

 

 

2015-04-04 15.49.51The museum shows how the animals are constructed form wood and in pieces, even if they appear whole.  Also the animals get smaller closer in to the center pole, an attempt aso the most elaborate carving is saved for the outside ring.  Notice that when you next ride a carousel.  Or maybe, you want to go to Bristol and ride one there!

This slide show will further introduce you to its glories…

Women’s furniture

2015-03-25 13.33.48

Although I hadn’t really thought of furniture this way before, certain pieces are gendered.  In particular, I want to the Yale University Art Gallery‘s furniture storage area to immerse in women’s furniture–objects that tell us something about women’s lives–from the Colonial period.

 

 

2015-03-25 12.38.09

We have often admired painted chests that women built their Hopes on, hopes for marriage that would come from a good dowry (textiles, china, and other movable objects).  The portable stuff in her Hope Chest would stay with her if she was widowed and pass to her daughter, to improve her chances.

You may make out the initials J and P on this chest-with-drawer from the late 17th century.  Joanna Porter was not John Marsh’s first wife when she married him in 1704, and she wasn’t his last.  From inventory, we know the daughter they had together inherited her mother’s clothing, and perhaps this chest.  Known as a stem-and-tulip motif, the carving likely referred back to the maypole festivities in rural England.  All about fertility.

2015-03-25 13.07.31Women’s roles change a bit with the development of niceties like this tea table.  Although made of cherry, a lesser wood to a mahogany that might be found on a Philadelphia piece, this scallop or pie-crust style tea table says so much about the changes in lifestyle.  Now deportment matters.  Personal cleanliness typified the new manners of a more affluent colony, and as the price of tea dropped, more classes could afford it.  So a table like this would set you apart.  Not only would you have the leisure to stop and drink tea, but you knew the right people, including men, to come join you and admire your expensive tea set and table.

And here’s where the trouble starts.  Tea tables represented something naughty in society–the emerging power of women.  Caused by many social factors, some men just couldn’t deal with it.  Unlike the puritan spinning wheel of female virtue and fertility, the tea table allowed not just socializing between the sexes, but also the chance to show off your fashions and flirt.  Oh my!

All virtue!

All virtue!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Harlot's Progress, British Museum

A Harlot’s Progress, British Museum, oh my!

How much better for your to apply your skills to the domestic arts.  That’s what your education would be all about–how to attract a husband.  Yes, you need to read and write and do basic math to run your household, but perhaps even more important, you need to sing, dance, perform music, and make art.

Plus do your needlework.  And how much better that would look pulled out of this graceful, 1808 2015-03-25 13.19.29kidney-shaped work table from Philadelphia.  This is high style and function combined.  Yes, you could move it easily to catch the light.  But that shape.  Well, that’s more than your average sewing kit.  Here you even see it with its original silk swag.  The shape was meant to complement your lovely figure, as you tee hee with your suitor in the parlor.  Show off all your advantages!

2015-03-25 13.08.23

 

A stitched cover like this 1753 flame-stitched, horsehair-stuffed seat would also be shown off in the best parlor and to suitors.  Let’s hope Abigail Porter from Wethersfield, CT, who made it, was successful.  She couldn’t earn a living any other way.

 

 

 

2015-03-25 13.19.41

You might also demonstrate your painterly skills on a what-not table like this darling thing.  You could use a pattern book, such as the Ladies Amusement Book, to choose your pattern for painting or needlework.  You would trace the pattern with chalk or graphite (pencil), then paint it in with watercolor or ink.  Voila!

 

 

A page from the Ladies Amusement Book

A page from the Ladies Amusement Book

The curators think these bunnies were painted freehand, since they are ‘naive.’  I think they are charming and would certainly be an ’emblem of accomplishment’ if I were able to paint such.  Which I can’t.

2015-03-25 13.31.32

Later in the 19th century, women’s furniture types grew with women’s expanding roles.  A beautiful writing desk like this tambour-door gem provided you a quiet space for writing correspondence or reading, indicative that academic subjects were now part of a girl’s education.  And perhaps most important, the desk locks.  Ah, for some privacy…

2015-03-25 13.29.20

 

The Eye Man

The Museum of Arts and Design is a happy source for sparking new ideas.
2015-03-21 12.52.54
The current exhibit of Latin American artists, like so many of their shows, mixes unlikely materials with functionality.  Like the chairs made out of lace cloth by Diana Cabeza.
2015-03-21 12.55.112015-03-21 12.55.19
Sebastian Errazuruz from Chile. has a shoe-art wall.  Love it!  For me, the show stopper is his commentary on labor and consumerist excess.  The Atlas with the world of the golden stiletto on his shoulder.  This in a time when women are spending well over a thousand dollars for glass slippers.
At my personal time of questioning/questionable vision, I particularly enjoyed the exhibit of Richard Estes‘ paintings, watercolors, silk screens, and photography.  He’s a photo-realist who has long depicted pop culture with his stylized muscle-car paintings and other scenes with hyper-realized reflections.  Here are his street scenes of New York.
Richard Estes, Sunday Afternoon in the Park, 1989. oil on canvas

Richard Estes, Sunday Afternoon in the Park, 1989. oil on canvas

Look at the vantage points he plays with.  Overhead at the automat.  Straight on with a couple lounging on a rock at Central Park, with the distorting city panorama.
Richard Estes, Automat, c1971, oil on masonite

Richard Estes, Automat, c1971, oil on masonite

In several works he distorts viewer understanding of reality and vision.  His confusing self portraits like this one with his reflection on the Staten Island Ferry.  His presence is a shadow, a reflection.  He’s really inaccessible.  More like a mirage.
Richard Estes, Self Portrait, 2013

Richard Estes, Self Portrait, 2013, oil on board

You might not be surprised that my favorite is “The Eye Man” from 2014.  Look at how he plays with reflection, being able to see, signs, windows onto another world.  “Use It or Lose It” one sign at the lower center reads.  Ain’t that the truth?
2015-03-21 13.10.28

Richard Estes, The Eye Man, 2014, oil on canvas

A slow look at speed

The snowy weather makes us slow down, but here are two films about speed you may want to keep on your weather radar.

speed-dating-flyer_aug1The Age of Love makes its point that the yearning for love doesn’t change at any age, but really doesn’t offer many other insights.  It’s a documentary about seniors speed dating in Rochester, NY.  Their event was only open to 70-90 year olds, so I had high hopes for age-appropriate, fresh fun.

Immediately striking is that the women looked a whole lot better than the men.  I expected the participants to revel in the freedom afforded by age.  But instead, I was mildly surprised that the women expressed the same longings they probably felt at 20–their lives didn’t have meaning without someone to share it with.  One woman had not married, so her sentiments were especially notable.  Does she dismiss her life to date as meaningless?

Both the women and men were either overly critical or not critical at all, in selecting people they’d like to see again.  Just as if they were 30.  They were needy, flippant, desperate, emotional, analytical.  Just as if they were 30.  The men and the women were hopelessly vain and as tied to cultural norms as no doubt they were at 30.

Okay, the point was well made, particularly to the Quinnipiac University undergraduate audience, who sighed and ah’d with each ‘cute’ thing a senior did or said and with the inevitable heartbreaks.  I couldn’t help but be silently critical of the youths for their superficial, unknowingly belittling ways.  Will they remember this film when they get a little age in them?

My friend and I did both laugh out loud at one point.  When one woman arrived for a first date after the speed dating event, she said, “you’re not the right man.  You’re not who I thought I was meeting.  No, forget it,” and turned to walk back to her car.

The gaggle of girls in the audience gasped.

Then the couple basically said, fooled you.  They had planned this prank on the filmmakers, and audience, in advance.  Imagine having a camera crew follow you on a date.  Well, with reality tv, maybe you can.  We saw one man, pulling his oxygen tank, almost get stood up.  Another said to the film crew, “time for you to go now,” as he waited to be fed dinner at his date’s apartment.

I’m devoting a lot of words to this movie, as the premise of seniors bothering with something as frustrating and frivolous as speed dating is intriguing.  But I was hoping for a joie de vivre that age can offer, a sense that the seniors were free to take risks, to dare to be different than their younger selves.  Instead, I left with a sadness that perhaps we never do change, let go of old insecurities, find a different kind of liberation as we lose the pleasures of a younger body.

Edouard Manet never had time to find out.  He died young, at 51, of syphilis, suggesting he’d done plenty of living up to that point.  But I digress.

Another form of documentaries gaining speed right now, and it’s worth a date, are the films profiling museum exhibitions.  Manet: Portraying Life does a pretty good job of looking at key works, and few lesser known paintings, by the intriguing Manet.  He was known as the master of the modern, showing us how the speed of modern life affected Paris in that 19th-century moment.

While some of the commentary is pretty light, following the speed dating phenomena of selling headlines to see if the buyer will want more, other moments are quite wonderful.  Each profiled painting is shown with musical accompaniment, no words, for about 90 seconds.  So we, as viewers, can simply look, or fall asleep, depending on how into it you are.  Risky, but worthwhile, in that slow-looking mode gaining in popularity in museum education these days.

Plus you get a tiny snapshot of what’s involved in putting a show together.  The series started with Rembrandt and continues with Vermeer, so take a slow look for these and speed up to get a ticket for a date with some art.  I bet you’ll find it more gratifying than dating with the seniors.

Caravaggisti Joy

The Calling of Saint Matthew - Caravaggio - www.caravaggio-foundation.org

Caravaggio’s The Calling of St Matthew, 1599-1600, with chiaroscuro — contrasting darks and lights

The followers of the Baroque artist Caravaggio were a serious lot.  Dubbed the Caravaggisti, they delved into explorations of deep shadow and the metaphors of light, following the master’s path.  Of course, they mostly lived in the 1600s in Holland and Flanders, as well as Northern Europe.

Georges De La Tour, Magdalen with the Smoking Flame, c. 1640, a Caravaggisti

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But you may be surprised to learn we have a Caravaggisti in our midst–Joy Bush.

Caravaggio as Sick Bacchus, 1593

 

 

Now showing at the Da Silva Gallery in New Haven, you, too, can immerse in her inky blacks and note the extraordinary color that emerges in the light.  She’s not fascinated by religious iconography or even Caravaggio’s scenes of debauchery.

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2015-01-09 at 3.15.24 PM

 

No, she’s interested in toys.  Me, too!

She gives them serious names; she treats them seriously.  I’m sure you see the religious significance of this stuffed elephant.

But really.  These photographs are just plain fun.  My kind of Caravaggisti!

Screen Shot 2015-01-09 at 3.16.05 PM

 

Palette Trees

The Florence Griswold Museum is known for its painted panels on the doors and walls of ‘Miss Florence’s’ boarding house.  Those artists left their mark in perpetuity.

Each holiday season, the museum also grows another tradition.  New artists participate each year.  Each paints an artist palette to be hung on the holiday tree.  Now over 150 palettes hang on not one, but two trees.

Just like the painted panels, each tells a little story–about the artist, about art, about celebrations of paint.  So fresh and fun.  In case you missed it, here’s a few pictures to give you a sense.

2014-12-27 12.19.452014-12-27 12.19.59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-12-27 12.20.092014-12-27 12.20.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 2015 be full of color and creativity for you!

The Story of a House

For a house that started off as two rooms in 1728, the Bush-Holley House has had a remarkable history since.  You know that I’m now a docent at the Florence Griswold House and Museum, which tells the story of the Lyme Art Colony.  Well, this house shows off a concurrent art colony, also of American Impressionists, who gathered in the Cos Cob section of Greenwich, only one hour by train from Manhattan.

But the house tells quite a story before then.  The original Bush who bought the house didn’t live in it.  His son David moved in around 1755 with his wife Sarah.  She died in 1776, while the British were running raids in Cos Cob and all around the Bush House.  Most of the settlement was burned, but not this Saltbox house.

2014-12-19 14.06.34You’ve probably guessed why.  Yep, David Bush was a suspected Loyalist and was imprisoned as such.  After all, his trade with the New York Colony centered on imported goods.  The wallpaper in his house was even imported, demonstrating his wealth.  During restoration, the stamp was uncovered.  Paper goods were stamped when the taxes were paid, a result of the reviled Stamp Act that so angered the rebellious colonists.

Bush’s political troubles didn’t stop from marrying another Sarah, and together, they combined a household with 11 children from previous marriages.  Then they added 5 more of their own.  This was one crowded house.

2014-12-19 13.57.37Crowded with slaves, too.  To run the farm, Bush had slaves who lived in the barn and more that lived above the kitchen.  Convenient, perhaps warm, but clearly spartan.  This is a curator’s best guess of how the slaves lived.  Like so many others, their stories are lost to memory.

Greenwich was sometimes part of the New York Colony, the last northern colony to abolish slavery, and sometimes part of Connecticut.  The Connecticut colony had a complex legislative history around slavery.  In 1788, the slave trade was abolished in Connecticut, just after the 1784 Gradual Emancipation Act.  Slaves born after 1784 would be emancipated when they turned 25, later lowered to 21.  Born in 1783, you’re out of luck.  In 1825, Greenwich recorded its last slave.

The Bush family took their slaves to church, and religious beliefs may have informed the decision to emancipate their slaves and support them in buying property.  Yet the 1799 will of David Bush listed the slave property and their worth.  Connecticut had about 2650 slaves and 2175 free blacks.  What a complex of scenarios.

By 1848, bad business decisions forced the Bush descendants to sell the house.  Two families attempted to run a boardinghouse in this convenient location, only two blocks from the New York train.  It must have been tough-going, because the Holley’s rented the house from the bank, later purchasing it.

Fortunately, they valued the heritage in the house and preserved its Colonial quirks.

MacRae paints his family

MacRae paints his family

They also managed to make a successful boarding house for artists, just like Florence Griswold further up the Connecticut coast.  See Elmer McCrae, artist, married a Holley daughter, Constant.  He brings the friends, she becomes the gracious hostess and flower arranger extraordinaire.  Look at the kind of table she set for the holidays.  Nothing like the spartan accommodations of Flo Gris.

 

2014-12-19 13.27.15

Childe Hassam, The Mantle Piece, 1912; in the Best Room, supposedly painted on a cigar box lid

Childe Hassam summered at, and starred at, both boarding houses.  He got the “Best Room” at the Bush-Holley House, paying a handsome $20 per week for room and board, compared to $4-8 for the other rooms and $7 at the Flo Gris.  The house is full of paintings and etchings he made while staying in the house, of the house and the Best Room.

Alec shows me the Best Room

Alec shows me the Best Room

 

Childe Hassam, Clarissa (one of the twins) 1912, painted in the entry way of the house

Elmer MacRae, Constance Feeding the Ducks, 1912; exhibited at the Armory Show, 1913

 

 

 

But it’s MacRae’s work that charms many of the walls.  His twin daughters, born in 1904, were the frequent subject.  After helping organize the 1913 Armory Show, which brought European contemporary art to New York, his style started to change.

 

 

 

 

MacRae's changing style

MacRae’s changing style

 

 

 

Without the commercial success of a Hassam, who was remunerated for repeatedly painting familiar scenes, MacRae had more freedom to experiment.

 

 

 

He worked in pastel and oil, carved wood screens, and the house has a piece of furniture he painted that I wanted to take home.

2014-12-19 13.46.412014-12-19 13.41.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-12-19 13.30.18

The Colonial kitchen

 

 

Willa Cather and other literary elites from New York stayed at the house, too.  Cather wrote the Cos Cob section of Song of the Lark, based on her time here.

The Holley family remained in the house until it was turned over to the Greenwich Historical Society in the 1950s, which is why its delights are so intact.  With a history like this, it’s really a must-see among the bounty of evocative historic homes in Connecticut.

 

 

As pretty as a picture, out the studio window

As pretty as a picture, out the studio window

MacRae's studio upstairs

MacRae’s studio upstairs

Finding Her Way

Art Times Journal does it again.  They have graciously published the third essay in the “Finding Her Way” series.  You can read all three essays here or if you just want to read the latest, check it out on their website.  Tell your friends, and enjoy!

Alice Barber Stephens, The Woman in Business.

Alice Barber Stephens, “The Woman in Business.” Cover of Ladies’ Home Journal (September 1897). Courtesy of Rutgers University.

Memory (and loss)

I had a busy day in New York today with four museums, a three-mile walk, two plays, and one friend.  No partridges or pear trees, but easily 100,000 tourists.

The most memorable painting was Velazquez’s Old Woman Cooking Eggs at the Frick.  We don’t see too much Velazquez here in the U.S., so make a point to see it while it’s visiting from Scotland.  You’ll also get to see a luscious Sargent I’ve only seen in the books.  You could eat it with a spoon.  Both brought back the pleasures of study, as another gallery visitor and I talked about Foucault’s essay on Velazquez and Las Meninas.  Ah, the good ol’ days.

 

 

 

Piwyac, the Vernal Fall, 300 Feet, Yosemite

The theme of memory, and it’s concomitant idea–loss–started to tie my disparate day together.  At the Met, Carleton Watkins‘ remarkable 1861 and 1865 albumen prints capture a Yosemite that really only exists in memory now.  Imagine carrying huge glass plate negatives on the backs of his dozen mules to reach the vantage points he made famous.  And those silken photographs are almost other-worldly beautiful.

While Annie Liebowitz is known for her evocative photographic portraits, she too has made landscape prints, now at New York Historical.  These are basically memory pieces, of places that are significant to her.  But her printing manipulation left me cold in a way her portraits never do.  Even as she may be commenting on the tendency of memory to exaggerate, the over-saturation of color feels unnecessary and inauthentic.

My favorite image from the show; Niagara Falls, 2009

Not so the deeply touching, wrenching really, performance of xx, the mother in The Oldest Boy, a play by Sarah Ruhl in the intimate Mitzi Newhouse at Lincoln Center.  Intimacy is important, as we enter into the sweet, mystical storytelling complete with Buddhist monks, chants, and Chinese Opera dancers.  The beautiful staging opens up from a living room to Dharamsala in India, the refuge of Tibetans.
James Saito, Celia Keenan-Bolger and Jon Norman Schneider

What if your child were a reincarnated Lama?  This mother, a philosopher of religions and student of literature, suffers the loss of her teacher, as does one of the Lamas.  His teacher has been reborn as her son, passing remarkable tests of memory across lives, as a three year old.

At times, the writing is a bit pedantic.  Religion is easy until it becomes inconvenient.  We want our able-bodied mom to take care of our children, until she’s not, and then we put her in a home.  Americans  always want choice and to have it our way.  The irony of using “attachment parenting” when Buddhists believe in non-attachment.

Still witnessing the raw-emotional process of this mother, played by Celia Kennan-Bolger,  letting go of her child moved me more than any theater I’ve seen in an age.  It was tender and genuine.  Beautiful and old fashioned in a way you wouldn’t expect of Ruhl.

The poetry of the set

As are the 40 years worth of annual photographs of the four Brown sisters, taken by Nicholas Nixon, the whole series now on view at MOMA.  Hot tip!  You don’t have to stand in the horrible lines, pay the highway robbery entrance fee, or tolerate the beast of a crowd for Matisse’s cut-outs.  These gems are in the lobby–granted probably the most challenging place imaginable for a meditation, I bet even for a monk.

1975

But do.  Meditate.  Watch these girls grow up, face life (and the camera) or not, lean for support, stand defiant…and survive.  Poignant, real, memories made tangible.  You may even feel a kind of loss as you let them go.  They are women you want in your life.

The Brown sisters, in 2014.

2014

 

Freedom from Want

As you know, my argument is that we’re in another economic depression now, and my day in New York made the comparisons to the 1930s striking.

Thomas Hart Benton Instruments of Power America Today mural series 1930-1

Thomas Hart Benton
Instruments of Power
America Today mural series
1930-1

2014-10-25 11.11.56

America Today

I started at the Met, where I finally got to see America Today, the murals by Thomas Hart Benton that have been re-homed from the New School.  Over the years there, students had rammed chairs into the murals, and they were otherwise degrading.  Now revitalized in glorious color, made richer through the darkened exhibition space, the murals tell the story of America in a moment–1930-1, when the Great Depression was just sucking away the country’s vitality.
 

 

Reginald Marsh The Bowery 1930

Reginald Marsh
The Bowery
1930 an artist also known for pulsating energy

 

Benton celebrates though.  America’s pulse, its chaos and determination, its strengths and its smarts.

Certainly compared with Reginald Marsh’s nearby The Bowery from the same year, 1930, the murals are propagandistically optimistic.  The glory of work, the ingenuity of technology, the voice of entertainment, all punctuated with clarifying red.

Benton loved red.

 

 

 

2014-10-25 11.12.38

America Today

2014-10-25 11.13.57

America Today

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Look at that red and those gestures!

Pieter Coecke van Aelst
Conversion of St. Paul
1563
Look at that red and those gestures!

 

While the curators draw connection to Baroque painting as an influence on Benton’s energetic compositions, I was also taken by the drama of the Renaissance tapestries, a newly opened, scintillating exhibition at the Met.  Surely Benton was influenced by the Renaissance body and borrowed from religious ecstasy for his modern passions.

 

 

 

 

Jackson Pollack Pasiphae 1943

Jackson Pollack
Pasiphae
1943

 

Detail America Today

Detail America Today

 

And where would Jackson Pollack be if he hadn’t been under the influence of his teacher’s, Benton’s, quivering, pulsating storytelling?  And Benton was completely modern, as you can see here.

But the art historian digresses.

 

 
Back on point, we, too, today crave celebrity entertainment and the refuge of technological wizardry to forget our troubles with work and the sour economy. We like to think of America’s strength, even as evidence shows the contrary.

2014-10-25 12.23.49

 

From the Met, I walked over to the newly-open-for-tours Roosevelt House.  After Sara Roosevelt’s death, in 1942, Hunter College bought the house and has been using it for classrooms.  Just about the only thing left from the quiet wealth of the Roosevelts is the staircase bannister.  I ran my hand up the rail where Eleanor may have, too. I haven’t washed my hand since!

I joined a tour/lecture, led by a history doctoral student.  As he told us about FDR’s and Eleanor’s accomplishments, I was most taken by the Four Freedoms speech, so relevant today.  Only the names have changed.  Have we progressed at all?

I was interested in the speech’s afterlife.  Norman Rockwell had a hard time getting support to make his monumental paintings of the same name.  Finally, the Saturday Evening  Post printed the series, which became phenomenally popular, driven by a Bentonesque vision of America.  Then the war bonds office came up with a program.  For an $18.75 war bond purchase, you would receive a set of the four posters.  And the rest is history.

Or is it?  How much do we tolerate freedom of religion post 9/11?  In light of a string of natural disasters and Ebola, how free from fear are we?  In an era of political correctness, changing mores, and lax gun laws, are we really free to speak our minds?

Grand CAnd freedom from want?  That issue was actually secondary in “Grand Concourse,” now at Playwrights.  Yes, it takes place in the Bronx today in a soup kitchen.  Yes, one of the four characters is a homeless man who teeters on the ability to get and hold a job and function well,  but I think playwright  Heidi Schrek uses her setting as a metaphor, a rumination on the nature of giving and how generosity of spirit can get twisted.  People younger than I am, though, may see the play through different eyes.  Check it out, and see what you think.

Regardless, may you be free from want this harvest season, on all levels of body and being.

Remarkable Minds

Being in the mind of the boy with Asperger’s Syndrome from “The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime” is amazing, nightmarish, poetic, angry, funny, noisy, harrowing, despairing, and remarkable–sometimes all at the same time.  I wondered how the book would get staged, and it’s a thing of chaotic beauty and wonder.  The staging with its ever-flexible grid set and the acting are breathtaking.  We are inside his mind, and his mind becomes his body, lifted, swung, tumbled, hurtled, crouching, collapsing.

Screen Shot 2014-10-19 at 8.46.58 PM

My seat was on the left center aisle on the first row.  I saw the goosebumps on the boy’s arm and could have stroked that arm as he squatted right in front  of me, in a quiet moment.  Close enough to see a tear smear his eye.  This boy wasn’t acting.  He was Christopher.  At the end when he asks, “can I do anything?” three yearning times with no answer from the other actor before the blackout, I wanted to scream “yes!”

This is some piece of theater, and if you want to amplify the experience, take in the powerful show of Norman Lewis and Lee Krasner at the Jewish Museum.

 

Norman Lewis, Twilight Sounds, 1947

Norman Lewis, Twilight Sounds, 1947

 

Their calligraphic paintings especially work like Christopher’s mind.  Lewis’ lines are almost dainty in their expression, while Krasner deliciously glopped and carved the paint on her ironically carefully-constructed compositions.

Lee Krasner,  Stop and Go, 1949

Lee Krasner, Stop and Go, 1949

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Many think she taught her husband Jackson Pollack a thing or two about painting.

Lee Krasner, Noon, 1947

Lee Krasner, Noon, 1947

 

And given these works from the late 1940s, before Pollack’s breakthrough paintings in the 1950s, you can see how.  Like so many others, she back-seated her career for his craziness, and we’re not better as a result.
 

 

TJM_KrasnerLewis_F30_KrasnerUntitled1949_hero

Lee Krasner, Untitled, 1949

 

 

 

 

Still you can revel in the works of this small show and enter the worlds of all of these remarkable minds.

Lee Krasner, Self-Portrait, 1939

Lee Krasner, Self-Portrait, 1939

 

Leaf Fall Season

This autumn is proving to be startlingly colorful, and what better way to celebrate than with a drive.  So a group from the Florence Griswold Museum ventured first to the Smith College Museum of Art and then to Historic Deerfield.  But first, some trivia.  Did you know that the seasonal term ‘fall’ comes from the old phrase ‘leaf fall time’?  The leaf fall was our backdrop as we set off on our journey back in time.

Our current exhibition of three Connecticut women artists includes Mary Rogers Williams, who taught under a dominant male artist presence, at Smith College for over 20 years in the 1880s and 1890s.  When she asked for recognition for her teaching service with a promotion to Assistant Professor, she was basically fired.  Even a woman’s college might not be so enlightened back in the day.

But it was fun to see her teaching domain and hear a sophomore talk about her research on Williams.  Of course, her source was the same as the exhibit’s–Eve Kahn‘s research through Williams’ papers and a trove of paintings found in a Connecticut boathouse.  I’m not kidding.  The paintings were ‘stored’ there and kept by the descendants of an artist friend Henry C. White, who inherited the works from Williams’ also unmarried sister.  Had he not safeguarded, in his way, those works and her letters, well, like so many others, Williams would have been basically forgotten.

Although we had a tour of the museum with a women artist theme, including a lackluster Lilly Martin Spencer, I was much more attracted to other women artists displayed there.

Henry-McBride-Art-Critic_large

Florine Stettheimer Henry McBride, Art Critic, 1922

 

Florine Stettheimer doesn’t show up in too many museum collections, outside of the Met and PAFA, but one surprised me here.  Her style is unmistakeable, and I’m always delighted by her sense of color and her take-no-prisoners attitude about art and being a professional and living her life her own way.  Right on, sister!

 

 

 

 

Emily Eveleth

 

I sought out the works of Smith alums.  Just loved the monumental jelly doughnuts by Emily Eveleth.

 

 

 

 

Betye Saar, Ancestral Spirit Chair, 1992

Betye Saar, Ancestral Spirit Chair, 1992

This particular Betye Saar work just makes me happy.  The back story is she was slated to speak at Smith, but that inner-flea-market- dumpster-diver took hold of her, and she went off to explore for treasure.  She bought a whole bunch of salt shakers, seen at these branch ends, like a different season’s leaf.  She was also two hours late for her talk.  What was Smith to do, except acquire the work.

Saar typically captures some folkloric, cultural, or puns on African American stereotypical content in her work.  Here the shakers stand in for a rural Southern tradition of putting bottles in tree branches to capture spirits.  The docent in the gallery said she thinks of this as a chair we can sit in and dial our ancestors.  I would have loved to have a sit in this spiritual phone booth and dial out.

Not to be missed are the “artist-designed” bathrooms.  Here’s a slide show to give you a sense of how it looks.

Historic Deerfield didn’t have a compable “historically-designed” bathroom, but its designs are equally inspiring.  I hadn’t really thought through that there were two waves of Colonial Revivalism.  One spurted off as a reaction to industrialization in the late 1800s through the 1920s or so, spinning off the Arts and Crafts Movement, Art Nouveau, and Art Deco.

In the 1940s, a second wave exploded, in response to the Cold War.  Interesting.  Moguls wanting to leave their legacy in the latest fashion built historic villages, with the Rockefellers

The docent told me that this door frame

The docent told me that this door frame is “bogus”–too ornate for the 1734 home of a minister.

reconstructing a Disneyfied Colonial Williamsburg and the Flints making their own mistakes with existing structures in Deerfield.

What’s fun is on “The Street” are the actual buildings for the post office, school, and two working farms as they existed in the 1700s.  Probate records and dendrology (using tree rings to date wood and hence structures) have helped more recent historians correct earlier mistakes, like stuffing rooms full of things, more like a gallery than someone’s Puritan home.

Probate records indicated that 360 panes of glass were bought for this house, and at 9 over 9 panes, we know there was glass for 20 windows.

Probate records indicated that 360 panes of glass were bought for this house, and at 9 over 9 panes, we know there was glass for 20 windows.

 

 

 

The Deerfield houses have these double doors seen above, because originally the houses all had a center hall chimney.  You wouldn’t have room to swing open a single door, so double doors became the style, as well as the practical solution.  Even later, when center halls were valued for entertaining and the chimneys were moved to the sides of houses, the double door style can still be seen.

2014-10-15 16.27.01

Besides small gardens associated with each house, several farmers shared acreage in a common field, where they could grown various grains.  These were used to feed the really money maker for Deerfield–stall-fed oxen.  You gotta love this oxen toy shown in the museum.

 

blue house

Who wouldn’t love this Colonial form of marketing?  It’s all in the unrelievedly blue paint.  Every bit of this facade–the dentils, the eyebrows, the pilasters–are all painted this robin egg blue.  Paint was very expensive.  Most of the houses left the cedar bare to weather.  The 1747 house has been painted this blue since 1801.  Why?   If you went into the tavern to get help resolving a dispute, you would ask for a lawyer.  The tavern keeper could then direct you to the blue house.  Unmistakable bill-boarding.  Like the leaves that fall every year, some things never change.