Dancing Lessons

Barrington Stage Company has world-premiered nine, yes nine, of Mark St. Germain‘s plays, and the most recent is Dancing Lessons, on stage now.  I really like his plays–Ruth, Freud’s Last Session, et al–for their old fashioned storytelling and well-developed characters.  No surprises, but emotionally-clean, good theater.

Dancing Lessons is no exception, with its exploration of the tentative communications between a man with Asperger’s Syndrome and a woman whose Broadway dancing career is over when she is hit by a cab and unable to heal from the accident.

Again there are no surprises plot-wise.  Even the sharp-edges of Asperger’s are worn off if you’ve read The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon, which has been turned into a musical, now on stage in London, or the hilarious Rosie Project, an offbeat romance written from the point of view of the male ‘hero’ who happens to have Asperger’s.  Why is it that the men are the ones with Asperger’s?

Regardless, the play has a crackling pace, with both broad and subtle humor, but also moments when the whole audience was holding its breath.  Our male hero has come to the dancer, who lives in the same Manhattan building, for dance lessons before a formal attire event he will attend.  The kicker is he doesn’t like to be touched.  The 10 or so minutes when they first shake hands to the very tender and revealing lovemaking is some of the most remarkable theater I’ve seen in ages.

And when the dancer’s leg brace comes off and the man’s posture straightens up, their Fred-and-Ginger moment is cathartic for the whole audience.  It’s an interlude that has to end, however, as the characters return to their reality.

Yes, the play is about damaged people, physically and psychically.  But it’s also about those blessed moments of love and grace, moments to cherish on stage, in books, and hopefully, in real life.

Arts & Ideas

Every year, New Haven explodes with every form of art and generation of ideas for the two  week International Festival of Arts & Ideas.  I’ve not been able to jump in until now, but my menu selections range from contemporary dance to walking tours to unusual therapy to performance theater works to aesthetic acrobatics.

Arguendo,” performed by Elevator Repair Service, arguably has an audience-pleasing premise: the Supreme Court’s weighs in on whether nude dancers, as in adult entertainers, are protected by the First Amendment.  Lifted from transcripts of the actual proceedings and montaged in a quasi dance-performance piece, the structure seemed promising.  But other than a manic five minutes (in which the attorney defending the dancers’ First Amendment rights argues his points in the nude, while justices toss papers gleefully overhead, all talking at once), I found the production surprisingly dull.  There’s a reason I’m not an attorney.

 

Celebrating a gloriously pleasant Friday afternoon with members of the Hamden Walks meet-up group and about 100 other people, my first walking tour strolled along classy St. Ronan Street with an architectural historian from The New Haven Preservation Trust.  Built mostly during the Industrial Golden Age for New Haven between 1890 and 1920, there’s nothing cookie cutter about the grandeur.  Each house is quirkily different, gently breaking architectural style rules.  The street has a coherence though.  A repeated motif of diamond-shaped windows, regular set-backs from the street, and consistent distance between each neighbor creates a pleasing harmony and peaceable splendor.

2014-06-20 17.27.30St. Ronan refers to a well or spring in a Sir Walter Scott poem, and the Hillhouse family who developed the street from their farm and estate referenced that Romantic work with the picturesque homes.  You have your 1903 12,000 foot cottage, not so different from not so far away Newport.

2014-06-20 17.33.59

 

And next door is this storybook house a third the size.  The house originally belonged to the women’s rights activist Agusta Troup, who along with her wealthy husband, was also a union activist.  Ironic advocacy for the uber wealthy.

 

 

Keep walking to see this gambrel-intense home of a “traveling salesman.”  Yes, a Willy Loman 2014-06-20 17.35.04type lives here now.  Hmmm.

Notice the funny mix of window styles, the emphatic asymmetry.  Very playful and fun.

 

2014-06-20 18.18.45

 

 

 

 

And what street would be complete without its mid-century modern?  Here it belongs to the widow of a former Yale President.

 

 

2014-06-20 18.51.38

 

 

The houses and stories go on and on, but like me, you are probably ready to pause and refresh.  You might want to head to the festival of food trucks in Hamden town center.  I did!  Along with the throngs mobbing about 25 different food vendors in the park adjacent to the library.  Two cupcake trucks had long lines.  This menu board might explain why.

 

 

 

A whole new day, and more adventures with Arts & Ideas.  It’s summer, officially, and the longest day of the year!  So an eleven hour day of activity began with a hike up East Rock, 2014-06-21 10.54.31that odd geological monument that serves as a marker and icon of New Haven.  East Rock and West Rock are volcanic cliffs caused by plate shifts and molten lava that cooled on the exposed face.  Weird vertical thrusts from the gentle hills of the area.

That geological phenomena created a sheer face of trap, or basalt volcanic rock.  The trap is so hard it has served as a building block, as seen on this house on St. Ronan Street.  Unlike the also local brownstone, which is soft and subject to erosion, trap is used in asphalt for durable support for intense weights or for building for the ages.

2014-06-20 17.42.07

East Rock Park was designed from 1882 to 1895 by Donald Grant Mitchell, a 19th-century pop literature author who took up scientific farming and landscape design.  Interesting combination.  This natural arch occurs right by a manmade bridge designed by Mitchell.  He2014-06-21 11.19.36 also created the paths, walkways, trails, and planting schema.

No matter what you see here, the earliest paintings of East Rock showed bare rock with no trees, so that the sandstone strata at the base was visible.  We just don’t use as much wood as they did for 19th-century fireplaces, so now New England is forested in a way it wasn’t then.

2014-06-21 19.25.45

 

Diane Reeves, with the New Haven Symphony Orchestra, performed on the Green, closing off a great day.  But the real highlight for me was Bibliotherapy.

 

 

Bibliotherapy (for adults) is the brainchild of Susan Elderkin, who has moved from England to Hamden, my home town.  In her book The Novel Cure and the workshop today, she explained how we can be healed by a book, instead of with drugs.  Right on, sister!

To get started, she and her best friend and co-author Ella Berthoud parked a vintage ambulance in a field in Suffolk, England and put out a blackboard with appointment times.  Then they started dispensing prescriptions of books to read.

They had developed the practice on each other, addressing wallowing and romantic problems and I-hate-men moods, etc.  Susan explained that fiction doesn’t tell us what to do, but instead shows up by example (or dis-example), leaving us to decide how to proceed on our own.  She said, we could read self-help which tells us what to do–Feel the Fear and Do It Anyway— or read To Kill a Mockingbird.  You get the idea.

You know that feeling of being transported by a book.  Well, Susan studied how the brain works, so that being transported leads to transformation.  She articulated that when we read, we hear a narrative voice that displaces our own.  We “cease to be,” we “become the story.”  Reading is similar to actually doing something about the issue.  It is an “alternative form of living” that creates a vivid, shared intimacy with the book.  The book and its world keeps us from being alone with our issue, even if the plot line is wildly different from our own.

Susan says that recommending a book is “almost as good as writing it.”  She called for us to read so we can “give the gift of recommending,” which brought tears to my eyes.  When she called for a volunteer, guess who forced her way onstage?  Yep.

Through a prescribed set of questions, Susan got to know my reading habits and preferences.  Then I stated my issue simply.  Even though I’m “following my bliss,” “doing what I love,” I’m still waiting for the “money to follow.”  Susan tenderly probed, and then she filled out a literal prescription for me to read: Stoner by John Williams and to re-read Bel Canto by Ann Patchett and Ragtime by E.L. Doctorow.  I can hardly wait to see how my world might change through this focused reading.

But first, there’s more Arts & Ideas.  Tomorrow brings a rose garden, a Split Knuckle Theatre performance piece called “Endurance” that is a mash-up of office politics and the Shackleton voyage-disaster, and a tour of a 100 year old shul.  And then there’s more and more as the week progresses…not a dull art or idea in sight!

 

Dancing and Dreaming

If you’ve ever danced around the living room, singing a Broadway musical song, then the new play “Somewhere” by Matthew Lopez, now at Hartford Stage, is for you.  It tells a distinctive story that is also very familiar, with elements of “Glass Menagerie” and cool mambo and the backstage drama, with characters so heart-throbbingly real that you want for them.  It’s an old show_somewhere_posterfashioned play, allowing characters to develop, patterns to emerge, and a third act crescendo to an emotional climax, combined with musical theater tropes.  We wait the whole show to see a character dance, and when he does…it’s a dream.

The time is 1959.  The place, the west side of New York.  A Puerto Rican family struggles to make it, but fills their tiny apartment with dance and dreams.  The mother and daughter work as ushers for Broadway theaters, memorizing every word, nuance, song, and dance of “West Side Story” and “Music Man” and “Gypsy” and more from that Golden Age.  One son was a child actor in the “King and I” with Yul Brenner.  “I walked in, I kneeled, I walked, I sat.”  He has let go of the dream, working to ground his family.  But this is like lassoing the Barrymore’s, here Puerto Rican Barrymore’s.

They live in the neighborhood of “West Side Story,” rough, rumbling, doomed.  Robert Moses had a vision to remake New York, and tactically, his changes changed lives.  Ten blocks surrounding this family’s apartment building were demolished, to make way for the largest cultural center in the world, Lincoln Center.  At the same time, the film version of “West Side Story” was coming to life.

Maybe you remember the opening dance sequence of “West Side Story.”

It was filmed on the streets of New York, in the few days between evicting residents and the wrecking ball.  Robert Wise supposedly paid the contractors $5000 to hold off on demolition between 67th and 58th Streets in August 1960 for shooting that dance sequence.

About 1/4 of the people who were evicted from this area were Puerto Rican, and many resisted moving until the desperate last moments, with power cut off, and demolition looming.  Only about 10% of those displaced from condemned buildings were ever relocated to public housing, as promised.

At intermission, audience members talked about their comparable local experience–tearing down the Italian neighborhood.  “I think Lincoln Center was more successful,” one commented.  Not all urban renewal works as well, sadly, leaving bombed-out areas like those post-industrial cities in Connecticut.

What was this experience like, living the real West Side Story?  That’s where “Somewhere” comes in.  When do hope-filled dreams become dangerous illusion?  When can we “imagine our troubles away,” and when are we merely deluded?  Who gets to dream, and who sacrifices for those dreams?

The play assuredly explores these questions while thrusting its family into an ironic version of the American theatrical dream.  Each dance in their tiny apartment heals for a moment, then the family is back to reality.  Or at least some of the family.  By the end, when the stalwart son is given permission to dream again, the final dance does what all musicals hope for–allow the audience to release its collectively held breath and soar with the spirit of the characters.

Jessica Naimy, Michael Rosen (background)And “Somewhere”?  I think it will soar, too, first to New York, then beyond.  Tomorrow, I go to Lincoln Center and will see how that feels after this experience.  I see a play about another New York legend, Moss Hart, and his autobiographical “Act One.”  The theater is in the blood–dance and dream on!

 

Charmed, I’m sure

Today in New York was a compilation of charming events.   No other particular theme, but lots and lots of charm.

2014-04-02 10.18.14The Transit Museum has a juried show of quilts commemorating the 100 birthday of Grand Central Terminal.  Each one is an eye blower, filled with buttons, bows, blocks, clocks, clocks, and more clocks.  A charming celebration of a most glorious building.

“What a treat!” exclaimed a man who wandered in.  “You never know what you’ll see here” (meaning NYC).  Others oohed and ahed over the workmanship in the pieces.

The quilt makers all had to work with at least one of four fabrics created by The City Quilter and cover at least 25 per cent of the surface with the selections.  So you’ll see a kind of consistent look among these glories.

2014-04-02 10.19.432014-04-02 10.24.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-04-02 10.20.142014-04-02 10.20.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-04-02 10.24.25

2014-04-02 10.26.44

2014-04-02 10.27.37
On a happy high, I had time to make it to the Brooklyn Museum.   I managed to show up on the day of the press tour for the show I really wanted to see : Judy Chicago’s early work.

So I went to the other exhibits, hoping to outstay the press.  The Civil Rights show is really worth a see.  Yes, there are the familiar, painful photographs and a hummable sound track.  But I appreciated seeing how artists commented on race and despair and anger and hope.

Themes like Politicizing Pop and Black is Beautiful and Beloved Community put some structure on the installation.  I found myself responding to Norman Rockwell’s “New Kids in the Neighborhood,” which he did for Look because the Saturday Evening Post didn’t want his social commentary works.

And while several of the artists depicted the importance of education, Charles White’s iconic “Awaken the Unknowing” is the most lyrical and powerful.

I also really like the anger in Robert Indiana’s “Confederacy: Alabama” from 1965.  More pointed than most of his work.  The video of Nina Simone performing–amazing.

I did leave with mixed feelings.  The hope the exhibit leaves us with and a wondering at our blithering politics since, which hasn’t accomplished anything close to 1964.

Then I surreptitiously walked through the rest of the museum, working my way to the Feminist Wing, where the Chicago “Dinner Party” and the special exhibit is.  What happened was symptomatic of my charmed day.  By standing at one corner of the “Dinne

Chicago in pink scarf

Chicago in pink scarf

r Party,” I could see and hear Chicago herself leading the press on a tour.

Then they walked right by me, and as she passed, she said, “hi. “. I said, “hi.”  Me at my most gracious and articulate.  Impressive, eh?  Not even a “charmed, I’m sure…”

Here is the best picture I dared take of the pixie-ish and stylish artist.  Her back, of course.  I

just couldn’t muster taking a picture when she was facing me.

 

Courage is what the working girl in the 1930s had to have, to endure the sexual harassment in the workplace. “London Wall” playwright John Van Druten handled this and the serious lack of options single women had then with a light touch and sure sense of modern justice.  Oh, and this was produced by Mint Theatre, which revives period plays that have been overlooked.  This one is a corker.  The play started slowly, but the third act is a refreshing whopper, all painted with a most charming brush.

My second celebrity brush of the day came with the ever-charming Dick Cavett.  One of the key players of my second show “Hellmam vs McCarthy,” about the famous literary slugfest between Lillian and Mary, after McCarthy’s appearance on Cavett’s show.

In the New York Times, Cavett quipped that he wasn’t the first choice to play himself, and the House Manager said everyone associated with the show is in love with him.  I got to the theater so early that I saw him arrive and share cheery greetings around.  Woo hoo!

The show was pretty good, too, with Cavett as a quasi-narrator, doing his folksy schtick along the way.  Afterward, he answered questions, keeping everyone in their seats for 15 more minutes.

So New York will do this sometimes–toss you a cookie.  It’s all pretty charming.

One of the Faberge eggs made by artists, placed around town; this one is at Grand Central Terminal

One of the Faberge eggs made by artists, placed around the City; this one is at Grand Central Terminal

Adding up the moments

Today, like everyday, was made up of moments.  Will they add up to anything?  You tell me.

The Met Museum has opened its season of new shows, and I think I hit them all.  Just for moment.  No reading the text, no lingering, because nothing really sang to me.  And that’s more than okay.  Just soaked in some beauty.

2014-03-22 14.18.21

 

Before my show downtown, I caught a moment on a swing at Molly’s Cupcakes.  Creme brûlée cupcake and espresso on a swing.  Oh yeah!
2014-03-22 14.22.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Caryl Chirchill’s play “Love and Information” is all about moments, literally.  In 100 minutes, 57 plays are performed.  Some felt like haiku, a phrase overheard on the street.  Others lingered long enough for some philosophy or a conundrum.  Some didn’t make any sense.  Others went for an easy laugh.

Some juxtaposed the obvious with the less so:  the exhausted Elvis and Liberace impersonators discussing Israeli-Palestinian relations in the bar over a drink; the clowns getting dressed in their outrageous costumes while figuring out whether to have an affair; the woman in a gown and a tuxedoed man awaiting their performance dissect the tensions in a friendship that source from mathematical theory and the psychology of the self.

I especially loved the playlets with one sentence of dialogue with an actor reaction.

“Maybe you could read them a story.”

The response–a tear.

The bride and groom on a bench.

“There’s wind surfing or swimming with the dolphins,” she says.

He turns very pale and away from her.

Language is a Churchill forte.  The dialogue is broken, overlapping, characters completing each other’s sentences.  The scene with four actors inventing stories out of a translation of the Chinese characters for girl, mountain, and door reminds me of games we played in college or a self-conscious writer’s workshop.  Gaminess both works for and against the overall effect.

The stage set is a simple box with a Sol Le Witt-style grid.  There seems to be no way on or out, so that the actors are enclosed, cocooned, trapped.  Darkness ends each playlet, interrupted by a box outlined in bare light bulbs around the vertical plane of the stage.  Loud sounds sometimes relate to the next scene, sometimes not.  Altogether, an intriguing game-like framework.

Yet at times, the show feels like acting exercises or the playwright’s experiments that should have been edited out.  But who edits Caryl Churchill?

Still, the acting, mostly in duets, is delicious, the sets magical, and the seeming randomness does add up to something–a meditation on information that is meaningless when pursued for its own sake, secrets, memory (both spectacular and faulty), and the pain that comes from closing ourselves in to our own importance.

Life is made up of random encounters and impressions that seem to be speeding up every moment.  This over-stuffed play and this day left me a bit breathless.

It only takes a moment to pause and reflect…

Monumental and ordinary

The everyday made monumental, the monumental made small.  That was my small day in big New York.

While the typically bloated Guggenheim show on Futurism may take you there, the Carrie Mae Weems exhibit is the real reason to go.  Known for her photographic commentaries on racism and the debilitating stereotypes of African Americans through American history, this show has several of her masterworks.

 

Her famous series “From Here I Saw What Happened and Cried” is a natural extension of Elizabeth Keckley’s experiences, dramatized yesterday, brought to an incisive and bitter cultural critiqilue.  I knew the series and seeing it as a whole is powerfully painful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its message gets summarized in this one image “Looking in the Mirror,” the first image that introduced me to Weems.

LOOKING INTO THE MIRROR, THE BLACK WOMAN ASKED,; “MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL, WHO’S THE FINEST OF THEM ALL?” THE MIRROR SAYS, “SNOW WHITE, YOU BLACK BITCH, AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT!!”

1987-1988

 
Carrie Mae Weems, Untitled (Woman playing solitaire) (from Kitchen Table Series), 1990

 

 

 

 

 

 

I had no idea the effect the “Kitchen Table” series from 1990 (above is the last image in the series) would have on me.  The Guggenheim has the entire narrative interspersed with all the images.  Each has the interrogation light and the table.  What’s on the table tells the story that mimics the written narrative’s words.

We go on a novelistic journey with the heroine, while Weems dissects a relationship–its rise, flowering, and decline–and the way community helps restore the heroine to hero status, after it’s demise.  Weems takes the ordinary, the everyday joys and pains, and monumentalizes them.  Don’t miss the chance to see this one.

When I left the exhibit, my chest literally hurt.  What better place for a healing balm than the beauty of The Frick?

In exchange for the jewel-like exhibit from The Mauritius, The Frick has responded in kind, sending its most famous works, including all three Vermeers, to Holland.  Hmmm. I thought Mr. Frick specified no loans, and The Frick was notorious for refusing to participate in the Vermeer exhibition that brought together all his other works.

Well, whatever.

If you know the collection, then you’ll enjoy seeing how the paintings are rearranged.  We now get a delicious room of Whistler’s, filled with works I had heard about but not seen.  This gallery is worth the trip alone.  Thank you, touring works!

But there’s more.

The focused show of Renaissance bronzes bring the monumental down to miniature, making them all the more impressive to my eye.  Not only can you walk all the way around the pieces, but you can get in close, study the details.

How does that rearing horse not fall over?  Hercules greatest feat may be defying gravity, in the model by Antonio Susini, who copies the original by his master Giambologna. Surely, Bernini studied these models or the fully-scaled sculptures.

Giambologna, Rape of Sabine Women, 1574-1582

Bernini, Hades and Persephone, 1621-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

Yes, I’m geeking out on you again.  Makes me want to go do some homework on Mr. Bernini!

The curators comment about Giambologna’s “vibrant syncopation of contour and form.”  Yes!  Bernini might have learned a thing or two from him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
It was time for me to go downtown.

After grabbing my favorite lemon peel pizza at Keste, I finally got to see Michael Urie in “Buyer and Cellar.”  He’s leaving the show next month to tour it, so you may want to get over to Barrow Street to see him while you can.  His over-the-top energy suits this outrageously plotted show about the coming together of a little man and the monumental Barbra Steisand.  The play is full of laughs, some at the expense of stardom, most at the absurdities of people just trying to make it through life.

In the play, Barbra doesn’t know what to do with a Sunday afternoon. I don’t have that problem.  Even without all my stops today, Washington Square Park would have been enough on this glorious, faux-spring day.  There were the men playing chess, the protesters, the hippie guitar player, the black dudes tumbling, the pianist wrapped in his coat, scarf, and hat, the blue-haired girl walking a dog, by shuffling along on her 8″ black and white, zig zag, platform-heeled boots, the pyramid of bodies getting their picture taken.

We are all monumental in our tiny universes, intersecting at unexpected moments.  It’s all there to see, in the park, as well as in the museum and the theater.

Photos of the day:

Central Park

Central Park

Park Avenue Letting Off Steam

Park Avenue
Letting Off Steam

 

A little farce here, a little farce there…

In between a generally funny sex/New York real estate farce and an earnest play about the founders of the NAACP and their possible sexual attraction, I took in two photography shows exploring the artistic possibilities of the photograph.

The shows at MoMA and ICP were spookingly similar.  What curators are having coffee or otherwise kanoodling?  Wait!  This isn’t a sex farce!

Still, you might forget which bed, um, museum you’re in.  The ICP show has a clear focus on digital, with lots of photos mimicking abstract art movements.  Doesn’t this image by James Welling look just like a Mark Rothko?  Yawn.  I can do that on my iPhone.

Walead Beshty, Three Color Curl, 2008

 

 

To make the point, this piece is from the MoMA show.  Not that the works aren’t lovely.  Just what are they saying about “what is a photograph?”  That it can be just like a painting?  Okay…

 

 

 

 

 

How much fun are the Polaroids by Lucas Samaras from the 1970s?  So how did he do that?  He started with a selfie, a self portrait using a regular Polaroid camera.  Before the chemicals setup, he could manipulate the image.  Let the experiments begin.  Make sure you see this tiny series downstairs at ICP.

Upstairs is a better show overall, I think.  Robert Capa was well known for his black and white images of war, but he worked extensively in color, too.  Covering exotic locations for Look Magazine, taking candids on movie sets, capturing the British Queen’s coronation, and more, I was most taken by the unexpected stare, the casual twist of a body, a glance at a party.

 

 

 

 

Doesn’t this just look like Paris?

 

 

 

 

Capucine at cocktail party in Rome, photo by Robert Capa, Rome, Italy, August 1951

 

and Rome in 1951.

 

 

 

 

2014-02-08 16.46.43

 

MoMA did what MoMA does–pulls out some greatest hits mixed in with some of-the-moment contemporary. While the crowd may gather around a video or lie down on the floor to gaze at the surround-screen-experience, I like the old stuff.

 

 

 

 

Harold Edgerton always amazes me, with his slow motion studies from the 1930s.  A drop of water.  A golfer’s swing.


 

 
Who knew Berenice Abbott did these kinds of experiments?

Robert Rauschenberg worked with cyanotypes.  Beautiful!

Bill Wegman up to his ol’ tricks.

William Wegman. Dropping Milk. 1971

William Wegman. Dropping Milk. 1971

Edward Weston plays with our perception, too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Both are Edward Westin,  Nude, Mexico, 1925

Today, I was really attracted to the hard edges of Charles Sheeler, Paul Outerbridge, and even Man Ray and Robert Mapplethorpe.  Beyond beautiful.

Charles Sheeler. Cactus and Photographer's Lamp, New York. 1931

Charles Sheeler. Cactus and Photographer’s Lamp, 1931

 

Images de Deauville

Paul Outerbridge, Images de Deauville, c. 1936

 

Man Ray. <i>Laboratory of the Future</i>. 1935. Gelatin silver print, 9 1/16 x 7" (23.1 x 17.8 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of James Johnson Sweeney © 2013 Man Ray Trust / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

Man Ray, World of the Future, 1935

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Mapplethorpe, Hermes, 1988

A classic Nadar, two by Julia Cameron.  Irving Penn and Richard Avedon. It’s good.

Nadar, Pierrot Laughing, 1855

Julia Margaret Cameron. Madonna with Children. 1864

Julia Margaret Cameron. Madonna with Children. 1864

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Irving Penn, Ballet Theater, New York, 1947

Richard Avedon, Carl Hoefert, unemployed blackjack dealer, 1983

Richard Avedon, Carl Hoefert, unemployed blackjack dealer, 1983

 

The show is all over the place, but still worth a look.  Then maybe you can figure out how two curators got together in a Manhattan location…, no, no, that’s the making of a sex farce, with a New York real estate twist…

 

MoMA Sculpture Garden at dusk, 2-8-14

MoMA Sculpture Garden at dusk, 2-8-14

 

 

A New York kind of day.  The weather warmed up for a Groundhog Day thaw, and people had a more relaxed demeanor–the gracious offering of a seat on the subway, easier smiles on the street.

Still, there’s the opposite, too, in the New York experience, evident when I had to resolve an argument.  Two street vendors were vying to get me to buy their $4 pashmina/silk scarves.

“He doesn’t care about color.  Just buy, buy, buy!  That’s all.”

“She’s mine.  Over here!”

“My quality is better…look!”

The scarves were exactly the same, probably off the back of the same truck.  The happy and quieting solution was to buy from both, after some dickering.

New York also means the micro local neighborhood spot.  I met my friend for brunch at Calliope, with its warm host at the door and its bubbly, tattooed waitress.  The East Village  restaurant attracts the pre- and post-show crowd by donating 5 per cent to charity from the bill of the New York Theatre Workshop-goers.

Opposite from the street vendors, our meal started with a quiet catch-up, before steadily increasing in volume.  Soon we were having a multi-table, anticipatory conversation about the show we were all going to see.

What’s It All About” is a theatrical concert of Burt Bacharach songs, inspired by a young guitarist Kyle Riabko’s meeting the genius songwriter.  I love those songs, made popular through the first three decades of my life by Tom Jones, The Fifth Dimension, Dionne Warwick, The Carpenters, B. J. Thomas, and multitudes of pop singers doing their own versions.

Here, the songs get a fresh treatment, in some cases more hip, others hard rock, like a rousing 70s throwback version of “Do You Know the Way to San Jose.”  Here, its  cheery blandness morphs into an existential query by a lost and angry youth.

But most renditions crossed between folk and a torchy soulfulness.  Although familiar words were always attached to familiar melodies, the pacing might be slowed down, the harmonies lengthened.  A version of “Walk On By” with that treatment brought out the true sadness in the lyrics.

For a taste, check this out:

A male duet of “I’ll Never Fall In Love Again” elicited snorts of bemused recognition.  Without the relentless pop beat, Bacharach’s lyrics took on new importance, humor, poignancy, wisdom, resignation.

Performed by a talented and very young cast led me to remember where I was when those songs were first popular.  “That’s What Friends Are For”–my friends and I sang that song to each other very loudly at a slumber party.  “Close To You,” performed wistfully here, was probably my first slow dance with a boy.  I don’t remember the boy, but I know every word of that song.

Playing with the over-familiarity of the numbers brought out their poetry for re-feeling:  “one less bell to answer, one less egg to fry” and even an excerpt from the prosaic “Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head”:

“But there’s one thing I know,
The blues they send to meet me won’t defeat me.”

Its familiar words and tune were inserted into other songs, making more meaning in each.

Most of the numbers were mash-ups, showing how Bacharach returned over and over again to similar lyrics and the same theme: love–its struggles, its resilience, its desirability, its obsessiveness, and sometimes, its satisfactions.  Having the theme teased out by a generation so far removed from my own was wonderfully heartening, creating a sweeter connection than I have felt previously.  I also realized that the songs hold meaning for a certain time of life, one that I have in my rearview mirror.

Now I think more about the complexities of place and ideas of home–part of what today’s  New York kind of day brought to mind.  A sense of belonging that is the New Yorker in me.

Photo of the Day: Cooper Union

Photo of the Day:
Cooper Union

Studying structure

I watched the new play “Row after Row” at the Women’s Project Theater with great interest.  You know I’m interested in new works and am a passionate advocate for women’s creativity.

In particular, I found myself analyzing the structure of the play, which interweaves contemporary scenes with historical.  The writing is fairly taut, playing out the themes of loyalty and union among the three characters, both the set of Civil War re-enactors of today and the soldiers characters from the war era.  Following the time shifts was effortless, aided by lighting and subtle transitions of costume.  I noticed how the playwright used humor and soliloquies, and when those strategies worked and didn’t.  I noticed when I was tense enough to clutch my hands and when my mind wandered.

As I’m starting to put a play together coming out of my thesis, all this analysis proved fertile fodder.  I am working through a similar structure weaving the historical and the modern, as the issues haven’t really changed all that much.

I do hope to get back to simply enjoying a show for itself.  In the meantime, my next analysis will come with the new play about the founding of the NAACP, through the lens of “Dr. Du Bois and Miss Ovington.”  Let me know if you want to join me.
https://i0.wp.com/images.patronmail.com/pmailemailimages/2478/506123/photo_1.jpg?w=584

Handle with Care

The non-football-loving Jews were all at “Handle with Care” to see Carol Lawrence in a role a long way from Maria in “West Side Story.”  Cheekbones and sparkling eyes intact, Lawrence plays the dead grandma from Israel, whose body gets lost in Virginia (don’t ask).  Okay, we see her alive in flashbacks from the day before.

Despite the presence, or loss, of the dead body, this is one delightful, sweet, thoughtful dramedy.  It really doesn’t have to be handled with care.  It reflects on whether we/the universe is guided by random chaos or a master plan, free will or fate.  With a very light touch, we consider how to handle the people in our lives with care, no matter the philosophical underpinning.

The same can be contemplated about the ‘fresh’ piece pictured below, now at the Museum of Modern Art.  Although the exhibit of Ileana Sonnabend’s collection centers on a controversial Robert Rauschenberg combine, my interest went elsewhere.  The combine with its stuffed eagle is a beastly ugly piece, which the Sonnabend estate donated to MoMA to avoid the taxes on its $65 million worth.

2013-12-22 13.46.48How much more fun to contemplate the juxtaposition of materials of Giovanni Anselmo’s Untitled (Eating Structure) from 1968.  So we have  forever granite plinth with a temporal head of lettuce, strapped to the stone with wire.  When the lettuce wilts, the small stone on top of it falls off.  Well, I looked and looked for that stone.  Shouldn’t it be obvious?

I asked one, two, then three guards.  Where’s the stone?  The third explained.  This time, the wilted lettuce slipped out of the wire and fell on top of the stone, hiding it.  Aah, I get it now.  A bit of the chance element.  They won’t touch the lettuce until tomorrow, when the art handler will replace the head.  So you tell me:  master plan or random chaos?  Regardless, handle with care!

2013-12-22 13.58.54For a long time, I watched the 1972 piece by Janis Kounellis, Inventing on the Spot, originally commissioned by Ballet Rouses.  The painting on the wall has snippets of Stravinsky’s Pulcinella, played by the violinist until he tires and improvised by the ballerina. 2013-12-22 13.43.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-12-22 13.44.11

 

 

A mesmerizing act of free will, handled with subtlety and care, plus an experience for the senses–a synesthesia–that literally reverberates throughout the exhibition.

 

To get a sense of it, check out my little video:

I spent a lot of  time with the divinely silly William Wegman video Stomach Song from 1970-1.  You know, he of the witty Weimaraner photos.  Here, he makes facial expressions with his chest and belly.  The sound track is his body-face speaking, then singing a song.  You don’t have to believe me…just take a look at the video.

So as you continue through this holiday season, whether along a master plan or swinging with freedom and chaos of it all, handle it with care, joy, and if at all possible, a laugh!

A close shave

Navigating the streets of New York can be a challenge this time of year.  The bodies blob together and form an unmoving mass on Fifth Avenue and all through midtown.  The blob is unmovable and refuses to part.

2013-12-19 16.27.49What’s a fast walker to do?  Find the mid-block  cut-throughs, of course.  Today, I happened onto a kind of alleyway filled with sculpture, like this Leda and the Swan by Botero.  Love it.

2013-12-19 16.32.15

 

 

 

 

And this perfectly silent walkway with fountains and lights–more magical than any Bergdorf window.

A close shave averted…for the moment.  I decided on an early Thai dinner at a restaurant so tiny that I can napkin-daub the lips of the person at the next table without straightening my arm.  I arrived at the unfashionable hour of 4:45 and was seated right away at the last remaining seat.  At the bar, I discovered that one has elbow room, but is knocked continually along the backside.  Still, the food is good, cheap, and fast, which works because I had places to go and people to see.

Laurie Metcalf in jeans, Jeff Goldblum in his costume--a suit

Laurie Metcalf in jeans, Jeff Goldblum in his costume–a suit

I wanted to hear what Jeff Goldblum would say about his character in Domesticated, during a pre-show conversation at Lincoln Center.  Not only did that cast have time before their 8 pm curtain, but so did I.

Goldblum plays a womanizing gynecologist (ewww) turned philandering politician (how obvious).  What makes the show different from the headlines is what happens next.  I saw the play a couple of months ago, but vividly remember his close shave with the dark side consequences of his affair.  But another tight corner was avoided by both Goldblum and his co-star Laurie Metcalf by discussing the play’s process, not their characters.

 
My favorite close shave of the day belonged to the Met, and its new exhibit on dressing tables through the ages.   I’m newly in love with the Met.  Every time I go now, it is such a joy.  This small exhibit gives you plenty of time and space to savoy reach gem.

2013-12-19 11.00.22

 

The ancient Egyptians loved their makeup, and formulated the concept of a box of vial and jars of stuff on a table just for that purpose.

 

 

 

 

 

2013-12-19 11.07.53

Look at the intricate beauty of the inlaid patterns and scenes on This dressing table for Madame du Pompadour.  This table was designed with all her passions included–gardening, architecture, nature–the motifs are all there to please her.

Several more French, Italian, and even American examples each sing their glories.

2013-12-19 11.06.03
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elegance was not reserved for women.  The shaving table was essential for the eighteenth-century gentleman.  And check out the wig cabinet, all the rage after Louis XIII started the 2013-12-19 11.17.15courtier-gentlemanly fashion of wearing a wig in 1624.

Give me a box like this, and I might don one, too, when visiting court!

 

 

 

 

 
2013-12-19 11.12.47The lady needs a place to keep her combs, of course.  The dense-teeth side was inserted into the hairdo, while the fine side was used for combing out lice.  Ah, the costs of beauty.

Still you might forget all your cares if you use this 1736 Chinese jewelry box.

2013-12-19 11.04.59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2013-12-19 11.09.28

 

Hogarth spoofs the way the privileged turned the private function of the toilette into the public, blurring the intimacy of a flirtation with the boudoir as public reception space.

 

 

2013-12-19 11.11.03Fun fact: in the Renaissance, toilette shifted from being an object (a box with jars and pots of creams) to an activity.  Think about it.  As more time was spent with the action of preparing one’s face and hair and…, the more specialized the tools became, necessitating a table to hold all those goodies.  A medicine cabinet today, though, is a pretty dispiriting  swap for this set.

2013-12-19 11.22.50

 

Instead you might want this spectacular 20th-century-modern jewelry case for holding your JAR jewels.  No, not a jar of jewels, but Joel A. Rosenthal’s contemporary, bejeweled creations.

 

 

 

 

2013-12-19 11.37.412013-12-19 11.37.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-12-19 11.37.15

 

For a mere $4000, you can even buy a small piece of his at the Met’s gift shop.  Then you have to get your antique dressing table to house it and your jewelry case.  You’ll be all set for the holidays, unless you need a close shave.  Then you’ll need this shaving table…

2013-12-19 11.02.42

Balancing suffering with humor

After a longing to read it for many years, I finally dug into Stella Gibbons’ hilarious novel Cold Comfort Farm.  Yes, I was that person on the subway laughing to herself…

But really, the Starkadder horses are named Travail and Arsenic.  And witty Flora Poste changes all the Starkadder lives with good cheer and a dose of pragmatism.

Turned out to be the theme of the day.

Chris Burden tortured his body in the name of art, notorious in the 1970s for setting himself up to be shot in the arm and slithering naked over broken glass.  Well, he lived, and like most of us, he grew up, tempering the way he expressed struggle in his newer sculptural pieces.

I hadn’t really wanted to see the show at the New Museum, but I am in a Body Art class.  What I couldn’t anticipate is the humor in his work.  He erects a beautiful bridge with an erector set 2013-11-30 12.03.49(memories of my childhood that makes me want to see the new, erector set exhibit at the Eli Whitney museum in New Haven even more).  Then he points a cannon at it.  Creation and destruction.  And humor.

Even his 1981 Tale of Two Cities, destroying each other through war, has a wink in it–it’s a whole world made of miniatures and toys.  The binoculars posted nearby will help you see it better.  Burden and his team took three weeks to install it in the gallery.  Talk about suffering!

2013-11-30 12.07.37
 

 

 

 

 

 

My favorite is his 2013 work Porsche with Meteorite.  If you saw that title on a novel, wouldn’t 2013-11-30 11.55.57you want to read it?  As you can see, it’s enormous and playful, as if alluding to some vast teeter-totter or the Scale of Justice belonging to the gods.  It’s not as absurd as Big Wheel from 1979, which serves no functional purpose, despite appearances.  But that, you argue, is art!  Yes!

 

2013-11-30 11.56.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here’s a youtube video of how the Big Wheel gets going:

I appreciate anything that makes me laugh, so I forced myself to see Becoming Dr. Ruth.  I’m basically neutral about her, but her life is a celebration of choosing joy over suffering.  And the one-woman show about her life demonstrates just that.

Perhaps the ‘wisdom’ that comes with age is knowing that suffering is part of life.  The phrase Tikkun olam means ‘repair the world’.  That call is one of the ways I identify with being Jewish.  The way to repair the world for Dr. Ruth is through sex.  For me, it’s laughter.  Let’s do it!

Spectacles

Ben Franklin responded to her request and sent his sister Jane thirteen pairs of glasses.  So began an adventure of discovery about Jane and her life.  Jill Lepore, the co-author of one of my favorite books of recent years Blindspot, has done the research.  More about that in a minute.

You might wonder why her novel is co-authored, pretty unusual for fiction.  She and her friend and fellow historian Jane Kamenksy co-wrote a story for a older colleague as a birthday present.  It centered on a Colonial girl who desperately wanted to be an artist.  The profession was unheard of for a woman, so she cuts her hair and dresses as a boy and becomes an apprentice for an artist very much like the ribald Gilbert Stuart in Boston.

The story was such a hit, the two historians decided to turn it into a full-fledged novel.  Not only is it evocative of a volatile period in Boston in the years leading up to the Revolutionary War, but also gives a lot of insight into how paint was made and used then, the role of the artist with patrons, and life in a paint “factory” system.  The pants role is just fun, and of course, there’s a love story inside it all.  If this appeals to you, I think you’ll find it just as good a ride as I did.

Lepore brings the same charm and historian chops to this new work (and continues working with the eye metaphor).  She spoke at the Yale British Art Center, where I’m training to become a docent, before a packed house.  I had already gotten the book Book of Ages: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin from the library and now can hardly wait to read it.

Using spectacles as an organizing device, Lepore talks about how close the siblings Benny and Jenny (Jane’s nickname) were.

He began wearing spectacles at age 24, while working in his brother James’s print shop.  James, too, wore specs.  Ben invented spectacles with temples, innovating the form of our modern glasses, and later bifocals.  Up until then, no one, man nor woman, wore spectacles in the street.  They were a private tool for reading.  Franklin was noted for having his portrait painted wearing spectacles–highly unusual.

And Jane wanted some spectacles.  Only most girls didn’t or couldn’t read.  Jane learned how with her brother, but her life was taken up making candles, making stitches, making babies.  She never left her childhood home, while her famous brother traveled the world.  She lived in penury with a destitute husband who moved into her parents’ house.  Her brother was wealthy.  Ten of her 12 children died young.  She was sad.  Ben was a wit and a womanizer.

But Jane needed glasses, and Lepore details how Jane was a voracious reader, even as she had trouble with writing.  By the time of her death, late in the 1700s, the nature of education for girls was starting to change.  So the historian unveils a period just prior, when an accomplished mind was limited by gendered work and poverty.

These bespectacled siblings, readers and letter writers, were both remarkable.  The glasses enabled them to look and see and therefore think.  Lepore talks about how glasses act as a door to knowledge and a way to hide.  Jane and Ben did both, in their own ways, in their own worlds.  Her story is a remarkable one, quiet and small.  How wonderful to celebrate that with Lepore and with you.

Miniature paintings of an eye were intriguing and fashionable gifts between lovers

Nobody can tell you who you be

The very tall, slim man, with his hand on a short, plump woman’s shoulder, said as they passed me on the street, “Nobody can tell you who you be.”  That statement was clearly the theme for my day in New York.

Anticipating my professor’s panel discussion with Eleanor Antin, I went to see a show of her work from the 1970s on constructed identity.  Oh dear, you’re thinking, how boring.  Trust me, this show at Columbia University’s gallery is anything but dull.  Antin is known for the harsh diet she put herself on to “carve” her body, documenting her weight loss in photographs each day for a month.

This show has a different focus.  More in the vein of Cindy Sherman, Antin takes on new physical realities.  Unlike Sherman, she clearly remains herself, constructing new identities.  Hilariously, she teaches herself ballet from a book and is photographed as a prima ballerina, on pointe.  The video of her own choreography defies the idea of the artist’s ego.

I also really liked the various nurse incarnations as Eleanor Nightingale.  Her photographs as if from the 19th century definitely have that period feel, even as she comments on Vietnam, the senseless war raging at the time.

Me, 1854

2013-11-02 13.11.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-11-02 13.13.55

 

And the puppets on a hijacked plane and the accompanying video of playing with paper dolls sends up gender roles.

Here are the dolls inside the airplane.

 

2013-11-02 13.10.01

My favorite was probably Antin becoming a 1920s, exiled, Russian male movie director, shooting a film for the nostalgic Jewish audience in the US.  She got the silent film stereotypes just right as she played off 1970s political sensibility.2013-11-02 13.10.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The work that stood out to me as perhaps having a different meaning today than she originally intended is Antin as King of Solana Beach.  She riffed on Anthony Van Dyck’s aristocratic painting tropes to indicate disgust at her impotence protesting against the Vietnam War.  So she decided to become king of her own geography.  

 

 

Acting as a valiant but ineffective ruler of a tiny beach community was her way of coping.  I saw the series as a contemporary statement of how insular and self-oriented we have become. We’re each king of our own little worlds and as such, have no room left to make other people and their priorities important.

That cynicism was both tapped into and eradicated by the new musical version of “Little Miss Sunshine.”  As Tolstoy stated, each family is miserable in its own way.  In this family, each character is passionately and uniquely miserable.  Except for Olive, the tiny contestant for the Little Miss Sunshine beauty pageant.  Where do they find these children?  Goodness.  At age nine, this one has already been in fifteen different musicals.

Well, if any Off-Broadway production were more clearly headed for The Great White Way, then tell me.  I don’t want to miss it, just as you need to hurry and get your ticket for this one now.  The scalpers were already working the show.

This one is upbeat for such a dark, miserable bunch of characters–laugh out loud funny, with hummable songs.  A very feel-good ending that isn’t warranted given the action.  That contradiction is part of why the show works.  It’s tighter and crisper than the film, which I think is an improvement.

And you might just come away King of who you be, with just enough room for all the other Kings out there who matter most.

Be the Hero of Your Story

Be the hero of your story

That’s the lesson a father teaches his young son at the opening of the new musical Big Fish.

Big Fish is another Susan Strohman show, sweeter and smaller than her typical production.  Even with the magic and the big numbers, this is really a show about a family.  The act one finale is a duet–not typical.

I do love the way Norbert Leo Butz moves and will remember his little tap riff with three enormous elephant rear ends.  And he has charm to spare.  He’s perfectly cast as the tall tale teller.

This is the first time I’ve seen Kate Baldwin, and I particularly appreciated that she, as an older woman, got a torch song, albeit a short one.

The show has that entertainment pleasure, but it’s the small sweetnesses that characterizes it.   “Time Stops” reprised in the second act, is supposed to be the break out number, and it’s a solo.

The show ends quietly, not with a rouser.  The audience gave it a standing ovation, while I think it warranted a more reserved and more sincere seated, straight play acknowledgment.  I liked it as a piece of theater and have a couple of the songs stuck in my head.  But it wasn’t as rip roaring as I expected.

Will its subdued and sad subtlety sell on Broadway?  It’s based on a beloved movie (aren’t all Broadway shows now?).  Is that enough?  I’m interested to find out with time that in real life doesn’t stop.

Amazing skies

“Art is a subtle essence.  It is not a thing of surfaces, but a moving spirit.”–George Inness

Although I came to the Clark Art Institute for the Winslow Homer exhibit, which is wonderful, I lost my breath in a room of George Inness paintings.  For a fleeting moment, I had the room to myself.

The gallery turned into a meditation on the seasons (see the slide show).  I thought of how a room of Mark Rothko color field paintings now seemed obvious in their appeal to spirit. Here, Inness is quieter.  You have to seek him out.  He doesn’t call out to you, “Notice me!”

autumn-in-montclair-jpg

Image 1 of 6

Instead, I seized the moment to feel his intent.  As a Swedenborgian, Inness believed spirit/god was all around, and “as above, so below.”  Swedenborg was certainly esoteric, but turning my mind off for those few seconds, I got it.

Then in came the other visitors, and the paintings re-entered their frames and hung on the walls again.

The big sky of the new musical Bridges from Madison County also transported me out of  the theater.  The space at the Williamstown Theatre Festival is so huge that the enormity of the Iowa landscape has been captured.  A lone tree against seemingly endless fields and sky that changed with the mood of the story.  The sunset and starry night sky put me right onto that farm porch.

I don’t know how often out-of-town tryouts get a Broadway stage before the tryout has even started, but I get it about this show.  Everything about it is pitch perfect.  The book by Marsha Norman and score by Jason Robert Brown are so tender.  Elena Shaddow is the part of Francesca.   Kelli O’Hara has already been announced for Broadway, and it’s not that she isn’t wonderful.  But she’s more Meryl Streep (from the movie) than Francesca. Stevan Pasquale as Robert is more in his skin than in Far From Heaven.  And their voices worked really well together, turning the histrionics of the book and movie into something more operatic, sensual, and immersive.

How I prefer a simple story about a family and a passion to that of a transvestite wailing about kinky boots.  The end is so quiet, so poignant, so lovely, so memorable.  How could the Broadway show be any better?

Out of the theater, a cold, driving rain soaked me.  Eventually I drove away fromf the storm, and as sun broke through the dark clouds onto the verdant Berkshire hills, a rainbow thickly pushed up from the ground to the sky.

Another transcendent moment in a day of land, clouds, light, voices, and spiritual beauty.

Musicals galore

What took so long?  Anne of Green Gables seems like perfect fodder for a musical, but I don’t think there’s been a successful version.  One apparently premiered at Vassar and has toured regionally, but has not played New York.  There are other versions, too.

But the one I saw today, curiously renamed Bend in the Road, well, it might be on its way.  The  New York Musical Theatre Festival gives three weeks to new shows, and this one certainly has its fans, given the whistles and enthusiastic reception for each number.

The casting, the tone and the book are all just right.  This Anne is just how you’d picture her and has a huge, but sweet voice.  The Matthew and Marilla are Broadway vets, both with soulful voices, as is the Diana.  It’s perfect family fare.

 

The show has issues though.   I think the music  is bland and won’t stand on its own.  It works in context, but I’d like at least one hummable song to take home. With a better second act  (including a strong number) that can approach the fizzy first, this one has potential.  Despite my critique, I was enchanted and charmed, as I always am with Anne.   I wish this version a healthy future.

My vote for best musical though (admittedly, I saw only two this year) is Castle Walk.  I was swept off my feet by the behind-the-scenes story of the Astaire-Rogers film “The Story of Irene and Vernon Castle.”

Milton Granger, who wrote the book, music and lyrics, has captured the verve, flair, grace, and romantic froth of the American Songbook.  Unlike Anne’s show which started with a strong book and had no stand-out songs, this one is filled with gem after memorable, luscious gem.

True to the Castles and Astaire, the dancing also tells the story.  For the first time in a long time, I wanted to be on stage with them all, feeling the swoop of the waltz, the rhythm of the fox trot, the sensuality of the tango. I could sense a little soft shoe in my feet, too.

I wonder if a show this old-fashioned feeling could have a future.  Certainly, all ages in the audience slurped the show up.  But NYMF is fueled by its groupies.  What do you think?

Following Holden Caulfield

2013-07-13 10.36.08

Following in the footsteps of Holden Caulfield in Central Park today brought out the kid in us all.  Fun fact about Catcher in the Rye–the New Yorker wouldn’t publish a short story version of it for five years because they didn’t want to be seen as encouraging runaways.
2013-07-13 10.21.07

 

 

 

First, we admired the Delacourt clock but missed the animals circling when the clock struck.  Boo.  Our circling would have to come later.

I didn’t know that the Central Park Zoo was formed when people dropped off their animals like goats, and the resulting menagerie grew into what we see today.

 

2013-07-13 10.35.26
Like Phoebe and Holden, we paused at the duck pond.  My friend Helen and I wondered what the turtle was doing with these geese, and we came up with some pretty good stories.  I bet you can, too.

 

2013-07-13 10.38.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-07-13 10.44.52

 

 

 

We gawked at the Victorian Gardens carnival, no doubt just as those two kids did.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Then it was time for the circle.  How long has it been since you rode a carousel?  Right in Central Park, a real old fashioned carousel.  Pretty great!
2013-07-13 11.01.04
Apparently, the animals were originally used as a Coney Island draw.  When they were no longer needed for that purpose, the animals were put in storage.  In 1952, right around Holden’s time, the original carousel burned, and new life was given to the horses and other figures in storage.
Another fun story is that the carousel was originally mule-powered.  The barker would 2013-07-13 11.03.36stamp twice for the mule to go, round and round in a circle, and stomp once to stop.  Apparently, children would lie on their stomachs to see underneath the carousel, fascinated to watch the mule work–more of an attraction than the ride itself.

I really got a kick out of our ride.  Thanks to Helen for the treat.  Holden told his sister Phoebe to go for the brass ring, a tradition on the carousel.  If you successfully grab the ring while going around, you got a free ride on the carousel, while grabbing the brass ring of life as well.
2013-07-13 11.33.21

 

 

We wandered off the tour at that point, and Helen introduced me to Hans Christian Andersen in the park.  We lucked into a magical storyteller giving us an African origin story, accompanied by a musician playing a kora–a traditional string instrument–that really added to the experience.   Evocative.

 

Our time in the park ended as the day turned tropical and sultry. We ducked into the Whitney for the superb Hopper show and then the Guggenheim for the transformative James Turrell light work.  The nautilus interior of the museum has never been more heavenly.  To my perception, it morphed from 3D depth to impossibly flat.  Weird and almost psychedelic.  If you haven’t seen it yet, make the trip, fight the crowds.  It’s worth it.

Kinky Boots held no surprises, but the vegan Japanese shojin meal at Kajitsu was full of gastronomic delights.  Shojin ryori developed in Zen Buddhist monasteries, based on the avoidance of taking life for their food and on simplicity.  Their tea ceremony grew into shojin ryori, the devotional practice  of the meal I had.

I sat at the chef’s table, and my meal was prepared right before me, the silence in the room only punctuated by the sound of the Chef’s wooden clogs.  Every so often, a server would bring him a tiny cup of something to drink that he would toss back.  Sake?

The quiet, a true rarity in New York restaurants, and the only decoration on the beige-gray wall a sprig of green leaves with small white, feathery buds, diminutive on the long wall reinforced the spare, Japanese aesthetic.

The food was oddly textured to my American palette, tending toward soft, but very flavorful.  Each course had some kind of exotic sauce to mix in myself– one sticky, another thick.  The server explained each dish.  “Chef recommends,” she would say, instructing me on how to mix the sauce and dish.

For the soup course, I mixed kelp broth with many ingredients–seaweed, tofu skins, morel mushrooms (food of the gods!), miso…  I think.  I could hardly understand the server, who was very sweet to explain it all nonetheless.  Etiquette?  Pick up the bowl and slurp.

 

The third course

The third course

I had four courses, considered the tasting menu, served very slowly, and wrapped up with matcha and candies.  The matcha is dark green from the green tea and thickly bitter like espresso.  You start with the candy, then sip.  Chef  whisked the tea for me, delivered it, bowed silently , then moved on.

Matcha and candy

Matcha and candy

Others nearby were having ten courses or chef’s choice.  I was plenty content with four–the end of a feast of a day!

 

 

 

 

A Broadway tryout?

What fun to be in Broadway tryout territory.  In olden days, a glimpse of stocking was something shocking, and New Haven was an important stop before New York.  Tanking in New Haven, not a good sign.  Neil Simon premiered something like 8 plays here, and lots of musicals got their start in New Haven’s theater district.

Now, New Haven has its own thriving theater scene, and the launch pads have moved more to the mountains.  The Berkshire Mountains.  So today, I made my first of 3 day trips to the Berks to see a show that definitely should be on its way to the Great White Way.  Great Barrington Theater Company isn’t in Great Barrington.  Naturally.  It’s in Pittsfield.

And it’s corny enough to have an enormous flag mounted on stage before the show started, with the orchestra playing the Star Spangled Banner as its opening notes.  The audience stood up and sang along.  It was truly rousing.

On the Town from 1944 hasn’t worked too well in Broadway revivals to date.  Too creaky apparently.  But this version?  Wowza!  Sexy, contemporary, witty, stylish, breathlessly fast-paced.  Opera, jazz, tap, ballet, scat singing, rounds, and the rumba.  Exuberant dancing and singing that didn’t make me miss the Gene Kelly/Frank Sinatra/Ann Miller/Betty Garrett/Vera-Ellen/Jules Munshin movie one bit.  After all, it’s still Leonard Bernstein music with Comden and Green lyrics.

I did get a bit wistful when the boys sang, “New York, New York, it’s a helluva town.”  But Ben Brantley from the New York Times said it best, “The production runs only through July 13, giving it the mayfly-like life span of the romances it portrays. Normally, I wouldn’t tell citizens of the five boroughs to drive three hours to be told that New York is a helluva town. But this enchanted vision of a city that was — and of course never was — is worth catching before it evaporates.”

Horrors of being Stuck

New Haven was the tryout location for New York and Broadway for many years, and the city still enjoys remarkable theater.  If tonight’s experience was at all typical, then I’m in for a good ride.

As part of the three week Arts & Ideas Festival, Stuck Elevator has returned after its premiere two years ago.  Seven years in the making, the young composer and lyricist have created a riveting, unique experience, mashing up opera and hip hop.  I know, I thought it sounded pretty awful, too, but somehow this blending really worked.

Based on the true experience of a Chinese illegal immigrant called “The Take-Out Man” in a fantasy/nightmare sequence (because he is a take out delivery man), Stuck recounts his 81 hours trapped in an elevator in a Bronx apartment building.  As he becomes more delirious, we journey with him through the harrowing voyage to the U.S., memories of his family in China, and the impossibilities of his life in America and hole he all too easily dug for himself.

Gloriously sung in both English and Mandarin by the Korean-American tenor Julius Ahn, Guang broke my heart over and over.  Then at the end, when for whatever reason the elevator mysteriously began working again at 3 a.m., hunched over, he silently walks out of the “elevator” space and off the stage.  The end.  Talk about an invisible man.

The talented cast included a Latino tenor who can rap and play a Bronx drag queen and equally talented singers playing several roles.  Then there’s the embodied elevator “Otis” that takes on Guang, “The Take-Out Man” in a visually stunning wrestling match.  The percussion with chop sticks would give Stomp a run for its drumming.  All this in a tiny black box theater in New Haven.

This one has a big future.  Watch out for it.