A little farce here, a little farce there…

In between a generally funny sex/New York real estate farce and an earnest play about the founders of the NAACP and their possible sexual attraction, I took in two photography shows exploring the artistic possibilities of the photograph.

The shows at MoMA and ICP were spookingly similar.  What curators are having coffee or otherwise kanoodling?  Wait!  This isn’t a sex farce!

Still, you might forget which bed, um, museum you’re in.  The ICP show has a clear focus on digital, with lots of photos mimicking abstract art movements.  Doesn’t this image by James Welling look just like a Mark Rothko?  Yawn.  I can do that on my iPhone.

Walead Beshty, Three Color Curl, 2008

 

 

To make the point, this piece is from the MoMA show.  Not that the works aren’t lovely.  Just what are they saying about “what is a photograph?”  That it can be just like a painting?  Okay…

 

 

 

 

 

How much fun are the Polaroids by Lucas Samaras from the 1970s?  So how did he do that?  He started with a selfie, a self portrait using a regular Polaroid camera.  Before the chemicals setup, he could manipulate the image.  Let the experiments begin.  Make sure you see this tiny series downstairs at ICP.

Upstairs is a better show overall, I think.  Robert Capa was well known for his black and white images of war, but he worked extensively in color, too.  Covering exotic locations for Look Magazine, taking candids on movie sets, capturing the British Queen’s coronation, and more, I was most taken by the unexpected stare, the casual twist of a body, a glance at a party.

 

 

 

 

Doesn’t this just look like Paris?

 

 

 

 

Capucine at cocktail party in Rome, photo by Robert Capa, Rome, Italy, August 1951

 

and Rome in 1951.

 

 

 

 

2014-02-08 16.46.43

 

MoMA did what MoMA does–pulls out some greatest hits mixed in with some of-the-moment contemporary. While the crowd may gather around a video or lie down on the floor to gaze at the surround-screen-experience, I like the old stuff.

 

 

 

 

Harold Edgerton always amazes me, with his slow motion studies from the 1930s.  A drop of water.  A golfer’s swing.


 

 
Who knew Berenice Abbott did these kinds of experiments?

Robert Rauschenberg worked with cyanotypes.  Beautiful!

Bill Wegman up to his ol’ tricks.

William Wegman. Dropping Milk. 1971

William Wegman. Dropping Milk. 1971

Edward Weston plays with our perception, too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Both are Edward Westin,  Nude, Mexico, 1925

Today, I was really attracted to the hard edges of Charles Sheeler, Paul Outerbridge, and even Man Ray and Robert Mapplethorpe.  Beyond beautiful.

Charles Sheeler. Cactus and Photographer's Lamp, New York. 1931

Charles Sheeler. Cactus and Photographer’s Lamp, 1931

 

Images de Deauville

Paul Outerbridge, Images de Deauville, c. 1936

 

Man Ray. <i>Laboratory of the Future</i>. 1935. Gelatin silver print, 9 1/16 x 7" (23.1 x 17.8 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of James Johnson Sweeney © 2013 Man Ray Trust / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

Man Ray, World of the Future, 1935

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Mapplethorpe, Hermes, 1988

A classic Nadar, two by Julia Cameron.  Irving Penn and Richard Avedon. It’s good.

Nadar, Pierrot Laughing, 1855

Julia Margaret Cameron. Madonna with Children. 1864

Julia Margaret Cameron. Madonna with Children. 1864

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Irving Penn, Ballet Theater, New York, 1947

Richard Avedon, Carl Hoefert, unemployed blackjack dealer, 1983

Richard Avedon, Carl Hoefert, unemployed blackjack dealer, 1983

 

The show is all over the place, but still worth a look.  Then maybe you can figure out how two curators got together in a Manhattan location…, no, no, that’s the making of a sex farce, with a New York real estate twist…

 

MoMA Sculpture Garden at dusk, 2-8-14

MoMA Sculpture Garden at dusk, 2-8-14

 

 

Handle with Care

The non-football-loving Jews were all at “Handle with Care” to see Carol Lawrence in a role a long way from Maria in “West Side Story.”  Cheekbones and sparkling eyes intact, Lawrence plays the dead grandma from Israel, whose body gets lost in Virginia (don’t ask).  Okay, we see her alive in flashbacks from the day before.

Despite the presence, or loss, of the dead body, this is one delightful, sweet, thoughtful dramedy.  It really doesn’t have to be handled with care.  It reflects on whether we/the universe is guided by random chaos or a master plan, free will or fate.  With a very light touch, we consider how to handle the people in our lives with care, no matter the philosophical underpinning.

The same can be contemplated about the ‘fresh’ piece pictured below, now at the Museum of Modern Art.  Although the exhibit of Ileana Sonnabend’s collection centers on a controversial Robert Rauschenberg combine, my interest went elsewhere.  The combine with its stuffed eagle is a beastly ugly piece, which the Sonnabend estate donated to MoMA to avoid the taxes on its $65 million worth.

2013-12-22 13.46.48How much more fun to contemplate the juxtaposition of materials of Giovanni Anselmo’s Untitled (Eating Structure) from 1968.  So we have  forever granite plinth with a temporal head of lettuce, strapped to the stone with wire.  When the lettuce wilts, the small stone on top of it falls off.  Well, I looked and looked for that stone.  Shouldn’t it be obvious?

I asked one, two, then three guards.  Where’s the stone?  The third explained.  This time, the wilted lettuce slipped out of the wire and fell on top of the stone, hiding it.  Aah, I get it now.  A bit of the chance element.  They won’t touch the lettuce until tomorrow, when the art handler will replace the head.  So you tell me:  master plan or random chaos?  Regardless, handle with care!

2013-12-22 13.58.54For a long time, I watched the 1972 piece by Janis Kounellis, Inventing on the Spot, originally commissioned by Ballet Rouses.  The painting on the wall has snippets of Stravinsky’s Pulcinella, played by the violinist until he tires and improvised by the ballerina. 2013-12-22 13.43.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-12-22 13.44.11

 

 

A mesmerizing act of free will, handled with subtlety and care, plus an experience for the senses–a synesthesia–that literally reverberates throughout the exhibition.

 

To get a sense of it, check out my little video:

I spent a lot of  time with the divinely silly William Wegman video Stomach Song from 1970-1.  You know, he of the witty Weimaraner photos.  Here, he makes facial expressions with his chest and belly.  The sound track is his body-face speaking, then singing a song.  You don’t have to believe me…just take a look at the video.

So as you continue through this holiday season, whether along a master plan or swinging with freedom and chaos of it all, handle it with care, joy, and if at all possible, a laugh!