Inside (and outside) the studio

Over the past few weeks, I’ve visited several artist studios, artists from the past.  You can be the judge.  Does being in their studio make them seem alive, as if they just left the room?

I’d say no for the Norman Rockwell Studio, where throngs of tourists encounter a guide, who has a spiel she repeats on a loop, poor thing.  It’s all so neatly packaged.  If the studio is intended to reveal the man, we learn next to nothing about Rockwell here.  You might get a sense of that from this perfect little video, with its perky musical accompaniment.

photo 1I rather preferred Daniel Chester French’s studio. Notice the broken windows in the skylight?  Now here’s a guy who was actually working.

Yes, there’s the guide, pointing out facts about how the Lincoln maquette is scaled proportionately to the Lincoln Memorial in DC.  But he also explained a French quirk–how he used his private railroad to take pieces out into the sunshine, to see how they would look in natural light.  He could walk all around, study the shadows, and such.

photo 2So here’s the sculpture on the flatbed railroad “car.”  See if you can make out the tracks in my less than glorious picture.  The tracks run through these huge doors to the outside…

photo 3

 

 

 

 

photo 3

 

 

 

 

…where they dead end.  They simply serve the purpose.

 

photo 1

 

 

 

And he had his tools, like sample hands, at the ready.

I like this place.

 

 

Nothing quite compares to the ramshackle studio of William Kent.  Kent died in 2012, but he2014-08-05 13.32.57 lived and worked here until the end.  A real character.  No heat in that studio that had been a barn, a barn used either as a slaughterhouse or for chicken processing.  Ew.

Still, traveling up hill and down dale to get to this extraordinarily picturesque ruin would have inspired any artist.2014-08-05 13.20.06

 

 

 

 

Kent didn’t start out at Yale making art.  He studied music with Hindemith.  Interesting.  His art work has pop overtones.  The sculptures, his most interesting works, are made from wood from a nearby mill and definitely owe 2014-08-05 13.19.24something to Claes Oldenburg, another Yalie.  His everyday household objects–the scissors, the hammer, the spade–are made of layers of various types of wood, often then add a surprise.  The saw that cuts through a lightbulb or a pepper.  A safety pin piercing a wooden football.

2014-08-05 13.17.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here are the tools of his trade found in his dark, crammed studio.

2014-08-05 13.13.52

And a different kind of tool, the inspiration for the cartoon sculpture series.

2014-08-05 13.14.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-08-05 13.27.29

When the New Haven schools abandoned chalkboards for marker-erase boards, he took on the chalkboards to carve as the “plate” for crudely-executed prints, sometimes transferring to fabric, as well as paper.  Strongly political and conceptual in a Warhol mode, these works represent the other body of work he’s known for.  He used this print as a kind of calling card, as a gift when visiting a friend’s house.

I’m leaving out the overtly sexual works Kent made, which caused a furor in buttoned-up New Haven in the 1960s.  So much so that Kent lost the directorship of the child-friendly Eli Whitney Museum.  A character, to be sure.

The William Kent Foundation is selling the works in the house and studio and will exist only until the last work is sold.  The Foundation gives whatever money it makes to “indigent artists.”  With prices that range from $6000 to $48,000 for the sculptures, the works aren’t selling too quickly.  So there’s time to see this unedited studio, so revealing of the artist’s mind.

Back to the more carefully-presented, genteel, 1760s farmhouse and studios of 120 years of working artists at Weir Farm.  Now we’re talking National Park Service.

2014-08-07 13.49.36This studio is literally as pretty as a picture.  It belonged to Julian Alden Weir, an Academic painter from the “tradition,” who, from 1882 on, would escape from New York each summer, and sometimes winter, to live on this farm run by a hired manager.  His art and artist friends–Duncan Phillips, John Singer Sargent, Albert Pinkham Ryder, John Twachtman, Childe Hassam–followed.

2014-08-07 13.59.23

It’s idyllic Connecticut.  It just doesn’t get any prettier than this place.  Rolling hills, stone-walled prettyfences, gardens designed by Weir’s daughter Cora, all framed by the softest blue sky and gentlest green grass.  Weir advised “go in nature and paint with a stick,” to capture the immediacy of this beauty.

pretty as

2014-08-07 13.40.38

 

Yes, there’s an oddity here and there, like this dining room chandelier from the house.  But mostly, what is here is Park-Service-prescribed heavenly beauty, dated 1915.  Can you imagine working in a studio this pristine, this picturesque?

You can make out the face of Weir's daughter Cora on his paint box

You can make out the face of Weir’s daughter Cora on his paint box

 

 

 

2014-08-07 13.58.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I walked the grounds with a printed guide to see just where Weir stood to make his paintings.  Thomas Cole’s wonderful house Cedar Grove up the Hudson River offers the same tool.  Magical!

Here, the artist story continues.  Mahonri Young, Brigham Young’s non-religious son (yes, really), comes to Connecticut to paint and marries Weir’s daughter Dorothy, another artist.  They live in the house, and

Clay maquette of a farmer, the working man subject Young preferred

Clay maquette of a farmer, the working man subject Young preferred

Mahonri builds a separate studio for his sculpture and painting.  It’s in much rougher condition and so not as charming as its Weir neighbor.

Still, who wouldn’t love this remembrance of an adult visitor?  As a child, he recalls getting in and playing in this tub of clay.  Delicious!

2014-08-07 14.11.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Today, artists continue to paint en plein air here.  As I was leaving, the artists, too, were wrapping up their day.  A day that allowed peaceful seclusion, but also connection to like-minded spirits.  An artist’s dream.

2014-08-07 14.32.31

Wedded to Art

Carolyn Choate was married to attorney and ambassador Joe Choate, but she wore a wedding band engraved “Wedded to Art.”  Right on, sister!

But her art forays seemed to be subsumed, like so many other women artists, by the rigors of her daily life.  Now, let us not be confused.  Although she and her husband started out fairly modestly, with his lion-like courtroom successes, they soon amassed enough money to buy this cottage in the Berkshires.  Naumkeag is the Native American word for the town where Salem, MA is now, the home territory for Choates, before making it large in Manhattan.

See the turret?  That makes for some weird and funny spaces inside this mish-mosh-styledimages house (Norman and Colonial Revival and New England Shingle), albeit one designed by McKim, Mead, and White in 1886.  I particularly like the round closet fitted inside the turret.

You can probably just make out the round corner, by its lonesome, in the corner of this parlor.  Weird and funny.  No sense of Carolyn in this masculine world, except for a charcoal drawing hung near her studio and a botanical watercolor upstairs.  Both quite facile and lovely.

While summering at Naumkeag, Carolyn hired a tutor for her children for eight hours of art instruction daily.  Really.  She didn’t want them to get lazy.  Admittedly, a music lesson and some swimming might have gotten thrown in there, too.

Meanwhile, was Carolyn making art, too?  Somehow, the house guide, who slipped me beyond roped-off areas and up back stairs to the servant’s quarters and into Carolyn’s studio, doubted it.

After all, Carolyn used their fortune for other kinds of good.  She started Barnard, since girls were excluded from college education, and then Teacher’s College.  She was one of the founders of the Met Museum in the 1870s, giving a priceless Impressionist collection to the new institution.  She amassed books to form New York Public Library.  She was pretty busy making a great city out of ramshackle, post-Civil War New York.

Screen Shot 2014-07-19 at 8.17.26 PMAnd Carolyn didn’t stop there.  Maybe she wasn’t making art, but she was instrumental in its promotion.  She worked with her friend John Singer Sargent to put on art fairs.  Sargent made charcoal drawings of Joe Choate and their daughter Mabel in 1911.

As remarkable as she was, try looking Carolyn up, and you won’t find much, except a mention on Joe’s Wikipedia page.  The fate of so many outstanding women.  Of course, not Emily Dickinson, who in her quiet way was also wedded to her art.

Emily at about 16, daguerreotype

Emily at about 16, daguerreotype

But did you realize she only published a few poems during her lifetime, mostly in the local paper and most of those as Anonymous?  Only after her death were her poems assembled and published, and not until those first editors took the capital letters out of the middle of her phrases and corrected her spelling.  They picked words they liked when Dickinson had still been unsure which to use.  I think today, we would consider such editing disrespectful.

Entrance to the front of the Emily Dickinson MuseumOne of the juicy stories told on the tour at her house, where she lived most of her life and wrote virtually all of her poems, concerns that first set of publications.  Her brother Ned lived in the house right next door, a wedding present from their father intended to keep his son close.  Edward and Susan seemed happy enough, although he apparently loved her, while she “loved him well enough to marry him.”  Get the picture?

Susan was one of Emily’s friends from the Amherst Academy, a prep school for Amherst College, both of which were started by Dickinson’s grandfather.  Like the Choates, the Dickinsons put their money into broader education, including for girls.  And it was that money that afforded Dickinson the ability to live the life she did–never marrying, becoming increasingly reclusive, and living in comfort.

Dickinson sent Susan many of her poems, which Susan kept, and only later did the poet start to make copies of poems that might have been written on the back of a chocolate wrapper or any scrap of paper, compiling them into her own little fascicles, or booklets.  Living basically as a recluse in the Amherst house, not even venturing next door to visit family, she penned some 2000 poems.

Dickinson children Emily on left, Ned, Lavinia on right Otis Bullard, c1840

Dickinson children
Emily on left, Ned, Lavinia on right
Otis Bullard, c1840

After Dickinson’s death, Susan attempted to get the poems published.  After two years, when she didn’t have success, Emily’s sister Lavinia (also unmarried, who stayed in the same family house with Emily and at one point, 11 cats–no I’m not kidding). gave the poems to Mabel Loomis Todd.  Todd was well connected and had started the Amherst Historical Society and Amherst Women’s Club.  She, along with Dickinson’s long-time friend, and sometime critic, Thomas Higginson were the editors who amended the poems and got them published, four years after the Dickinson’s death in 1886.  The poetry was an instant success, and Dickinson became posthumously famous.

Behind this official story, is a bit of drama.  That first publication did not include the poems Emily wrote to Susan, who kept them locked away until her own death.  Then Susan’s daughter Martha, a writer of potboilers, took over care and publishing of Emily’s works.  So why did Susan hoard away these poems, when the rest were published?

Turns out, Mabel Loomis Todd was having a long-term affair with Susan’s husband, Emily’s and Lavinia’s brother, Edward.  Oh my.  So the family split.  Lavinia had taken the poems to Todd and sided with her brother, wishing for his happiness.  Susan’s and Ned’s children sided with their mother.  Sigh.  Family dynamics are never dull, are they?

As with so much, Emily remains a mystery on the subject.

Amherst mural with Emily Dickinson framed by trees

Amherst mural with Emily Dickinson framed by trees

Regardless, like Carolyn Choate with her paintings, Emily Dickinson created for her own pleasure.  They were contemporaries, one living in more freewheeling New York, the other in more staid New England.  But both had a loud voice, and both would make long-lasting creations–Choate’s very public works, Emily’s very private ruminations brought out into the sunlight.

We are the beneficiaries.

 

In Emily’s words,

There is no Frigate like a Book
To take us Lands away

 

I would only add the ‘frigate of art’ and nod at both these women, so wedded to their art which bring us so much pleasure today.

Courtney at Emily Dickinson's grave Buried with her family, as she lived her life Remembered by many, including us, leaving stones, pennies, shells, pencils, notes, and even a book

Courtney at Emily Dickinson’s grave
Buried with her family, as she lived her life
Remembered by many, including us, leaving stones, pennies, shells, pencils, notes, and even a book

Mesmerized

Garry Winogrand is getting the full treatment at the Met, with an exhibition of previously unprinted images.  Regardless of the controversy about that (what was the artist’s intention?), his work has all the freshness, immediacy, sadness, and irreverence it ever had.

El Morocco, 1955

 

What a way to see New York in the 50s through the 70s.  How did he get those shots?  Did he zoom from a distance?  He has a right-fhereness sensibility.  He puts us on the scene.

 

 

Central Park Zoo, 1967

What do you make of this image?  Of course, this is one of his more provocative works.  I’m immediately reminded of Karen Joy Fowler’s remarkable sibling novel We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves.  But that’s not how most have seen it.  The wall text argues that because the man was a famous animal handler, this is more an image of love than miscegenation.

Los Angeles, 1969

I find this image more disturbing.  Winogrand refuses to discuss the content of his images, saying this one is about light.  Boy, is it!  Look at how the light tells this particular story.  How do you interpret the boy’s thoughts and experience?

State Fair of Texas, Dallas, 1964

State Fair of Texas, Dallas, 1964

 

 

Of course, Winogrand is wry and funny, too.  I liked the implied commentary in this image of my Dallas hometown.  I couldn’t agree more, on every level.

Las Vegas, 1957

 

 

 

 

Some images are just beautiful…

 

 

 

New York, 1960

 

 

 

 

…many are wistful

 

 

New York, 1960

 

 

 

 

…and empty

 

 

 

 

 

 

…and mesmerizing.

1964 World’s Fair

 

The way the Jeff Koons exhibit at the Whitney mesmerized me was a surprise.  They’ve given the whole building over to him, the swan song show for their Upper East Side location.  Well, I gave it 15 minutes, which is all the fame I think he deserves.

2014-07-12 12.49.33

 

What fascinated me was the number of children, little children, there.  You don’t see children at most exhibits, none at the Winogrand show.  An unknowing visitor could think you were at a children’s museum.

2014-07-12 12.52.30

 

 

 

Here, the children responded with unrestrained glee at the Koons oversized toys and balloons, while the uber-sophisticates were trying to make his readymades into high art.  I put my Winogrand lens on and started taking images of the people.

Balloon Venus

Balloon Venus

 

 

Koons gets the last laugh.  His balloon antiquities, like this riff on the Venus of Willendorf, and over-sized pop icons sell for millions, even if the only people who seem to really enjoy them are the very young.

 

 

 

 

2014-07-12 12.53.41

 

 

The best moment?  “Let’s go look at the train, Grandma!”  That’s how I think Koons will live into posterity!

 

 

2014-07-12 12.53.58

2014-07-12 16.09.08

 

Such a serious young man.

 

 

 

 

The Museum of Arts and Design (MAD) Biennial–yes, they are doing one, too–comes out of the same sensibility as Koons.  Appropriation, twists on the readymades.  But even in this jumble of a show, there’s more inventiveness, wonder, and genuine delight.

2014-07-12 16.24.59

 

 

 

 

I couldn’t move from the Noa Zilberman video where the woman was applying wrinkles that were strands of gold.

 

 

2014-07-12 16.20.51

 

Like Koons, many of the artists play with materials.  Todd Pavlisko uses retail tag fasteners to create his huge  portrait of Richard Pryor.  Can you make out the texture?

2014-07-12 16.20.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I’m partial to MAD chairs.  Every exhibit has them.  Here are three I really liked this time.

2014-07-12 16.19.192014-07-12 16.17.33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-07-12 16.19.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The terrarium room is mesmerizing.  I felt like I was underwater, swaying with the rhythm you may hear in this video.

Mash-ups

2014-06-29 11.14.02Today, I’m living juxtapositions.  My day started at the Bellamy-Ferraday House, where the Connecticut Chapter of JASNA had its annual Box Hill Picnic.  First, we had a private tour of the house.  What really stood out for me are the ironies.

The land was bought from the Indians in the 1720s, and the first English families came  in the 1730s.  Well, in the winter, it was too far to go the seven miles into town for the Congregationalist Church.  So now a newly minted parish, the farming area got its own minister, a very young Yale grad named Bellamy.  This house was pretty fancy for the era and the isolated location near Bethlehem (ahem, Connecticut).

Mr. Bellamy made money from his sermons and pamphlets, but what I found so hilarious is that he wrote a best seller, True Religion Delineated, which according to our tour guide is completely unreadable today, even for ministry students.  Bellamy made enough of a splash with the book that it became popular in England, too.  Positively an 18th-century Stephen King!

His wealth came from such an unlikely source, when in the Colonies, fortunes were usually the way from trade.  Bellamy lived really well, as did his descendants.  So it took the last owner of the house to appear the most big-hearted and service-oriented.  Again defying 2014-06-29 12.13.21expectations, Caroline Ferraday ventured forward as an actress, with a glamor shot showing her to be a gorgeous lady.  She contributed to the Victorian appearance and additions to the house.  Living the good life.

But I think she’s remarkable for taking the global lead on helping the Jewish women who were experimented on at Dachau concentration camp, when literally no one else would.  The details are too graphic and disturbing to include here.  Suffice it to say, she made a difference and even became friends with some of the survivors.

The minister seemed to savor his money; the actress used hers to help others.  Ironic.

Not being too far way, I then jumped on the Northwest Connecticut Arts Council Open Your Eyes artist studio tour.  I had a wonderful conversation with Anne Delaney.  For the tour, she luscious studies for works she may paint based on the particular tour setting.  Instead of in her New York studio, this tour brought people to the Harwinton Community Hall, which also houses a jail.  Delaney Anne Delaneydid graphite works of John Brown and other more abstracted figures along this theme.

I picked up this little painting from her Family Car series, loving the back-of-the-head invitation into the painting.

She also told me about a friend who has made a documentary film on the Baroque artist Artemesia Genileschi, juxtaposing the artist’s story with her effect on women today, including the filmmaker.

Here’s the trailer from the film “A Woman Like That.”  It’s on the film festival and university circuit, so keep you eyes open for it.

Judith Bird makes these lovely mash-ups of Mexican-style retablos and the fanciful color andJudith Bird, Wild Wood Bird magic realism of an artist like Florine Stettheimer.  Bird loves using birds in her work, as they touch both heaven and earth, soar and are grounded.  I love that!

You can see the artist’s sweetness in Wild Wood Bird.”  The painting definitely has the devotional feel of the folk art retablo with her own eponymous bird symbol.

The funniest mash-ups of the day came from 84-year-old artist Salvatore Gulino.  Sal was really why I went on the tour, and we talked for almost an hour about his work and his life.  He is extremely modest about his work and that I would go ga ga over it.  But really, what art historian wouldn’t?

Screen Shot 2014-06-29 at 7.01.46 PM

 

Forget Modigiliani, I”m turning over in my grave.

Screen Shot 2014-06-29 at 7.03.18 PM

 

 

 

 

A classical portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni by Ghirlandaio juxtaposed on a classic screen-shot.

 

 

 

 

 

For my 50s modern house, I couldn’t resist this mash-up from the Art Wheels SeriesNefertiti never had it so good!

Salvatore Guilino, Nefertiti

And neither will you, when you come to visit!

 

 

 

Elizabeth Okie Paxton

Elizabeth Okie Paxton 1877-1971

Elizabeth Okie Paxton
1877-1971

Since you’ve been so supportive of my research on American women artists and thesis on Elizabeth Okie Paxton, I wanted to let you know an article on Paxton has been published in Art Times.

Here’s a link to the site, and the online version of the article is at the upper left corner.

http://arttimesjournal.com/

You’ll see this picture of Paxton.  Enjoy, and spread the word!  The world needs to know about her work!

Subtlety

2014-05-30 18.25.31

There’s really nothing subtle about Kara Walker’s masterwork “A Subtlety” at the derelict Domino Sugar Factory in Brooklyn.  Before the factory, and its history, are removed for urban development (yes, condos), Kara Walker has contextualized and commented on the history of this factory and sugar manufacture as a whole.

The sugar-mammy-sphinx rises four stories high in the sticky sweet remains of the factory.  The architecture clamps her in place, and her noble bearing, with its inevitable comparison to  Egypt’s Sphinx, here is sexualized with enormous breasts, a distended rump, and visible vulva.  Her facial features, accentuated by the head cloth, are stereotypical, exaggerated, and bulbous.

She is at once vulnerable and proud, caged and powerful.

 

The construction armature is visible

The construction armature is visible

 

With this figure made of sugar-coated polystyrene blocks, Walker has pinned a biting statement on the cost of sugar and sugar production, in terms of slavery and the devastation of a people.  It’s her send-off for the blighted behemoth on the waterfront and its connection to the historical sugar trade.

And as a piece of art, it has a huge visceral effect.  I knew I was in the presence of something great.  Its here-ness also makes the issues it provokes seem topical and timely in today’s diverse and more tolerant society.  History is today, Walker seems to say.  Pay attention.

 

Kara Walker creating the monument

Domino donated 160,000 pounds of sugar for the project.  The figure sits in a nest of granulated sugar, and yet the sculpture diffuses over time.  The features are no longer as crisp as shown here.  Who knows how much will be left of it when the exhibit closes July 6?

The approach to the sculpture is via a long walkway, with the figure radiating at the end of the dark, molasses-stained corridor.

You walk past many sculptures made of molasses, showing children at work in various stages of production.

2014-05-30 18.30.222014-05-30 18.29.37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You promenade past these larger-than-life-sized children, working for our sugar pleasure.  They stand in puddles of molasses as if melting away in anonymity, becoming one with the other key ingredient of the production process.

2014-05-30 18.28.492014-05-30 18.28.37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So the figures, both the large and the monumental, are ever changing in this environment of continuing decay.  It’s as if Walker says these issues are not statically stuck in the past, but continue to effect us today.  They must be acknowledged, interpreted, and kept relevant so we can choose a different path.

Subtle this is not.  Compelling and haunting, it is.

 

 

 

 

You can give me a gift like this anytime

This is Senior Week at Yale, the time leading up to their graduation.  So all kinds of events celebrate University notables from today and yesterday.

A curator from MoMA was in town to discuss a Claes Oldenburg sculpture on the Yale campus. The then-famous pop/conceptual artist was an alum, although at Yale he studied literature.  For many years, Oldenburg thought he wanted to be a writer and worked as a journalist.  Things started to change when he moved to New York and immersed himself in its streets and bric-a-brac storefronts on the Lower East Side.

He began to make works of the commercial, the mundane, and with the help of his wife, made colossal sized sculptures of hamburgers and rubber stamps and more.

He made the Yale work as a gift, and after fabrication and flat-bed trucking it to campus, literally assembled it with no warning in the Beinecke Library Plaza.

Surprise was a key element.  The year was 1969 ,and protest was in the air.

While Oldenburg doesn’t call Lipstick Ascending on Caterpillar Tracks a political work, it’s hard not to see the army tank topped by a tube of lipstick as anything but.

The inflatable lipstick deflated regularly; easy to see its erotic undertones.

From the first, students used the “monument” to post notices of protests and posters for other campus events.  Over time, apparently it was vandalized and deteriorated.

In fact, the original lipstick was made of a soft material that didn’t even last two weeks before being replaced by sturdier fiberglass.

Ultimately the sculpture was removed, at least in part because it was seen as incendiary on this traditional campus.  Ironically, it showed at the Guggenheim, where it was surrounded by stanchions–“keep off!” they communicate.

Reinstalled at Yale in 1974 after restoration, it now is a notable part of Yale’s identity.  One audience member commented that a senior rite of passage is to eat a particular greasy sandwich while sitting on the sculpture (although campus rules prohibit touching the sculpture, rarely is it seen without a rider).

We watched a film of the fabrication, done by  Lippincott in North Haven nearby.  That foundry also fabricated Barnett Newman’s works of broken obelisks.  They apparently knew what they were doing.

Frank and Ed, identified in the film, did their work while also laughing with the artist.  One commented that “I think they (Yale) should accept the sculpture because it’s fine art.” A far cry from how Oldenburg’s “low” subject matter was first received.

Still, at the time, such a hybrid sculpture as Lipstick was radical.  Not a sculpture out of steel or marble, but made of plywood and fabric.  Not a monumental subject, but an ordinary subject made monumental.  And not easily interpreted or understood, as two very different kinds of imagery were molded together.

The model in the Yale University Art Gallery

As the students gathered and began to clap the slapdash installation of the work, an official of Yale, unidentified, said, “It’s grand and beautiful and monumental.”  And so it remains today.  A commentary about the power of women, the changing university experience as Yale went co-ed, the Vietnam war, and much more can be read from it.  But it’s also silly, playful, absurd, fantastical, and fun.

If Oldenburg wants to drop a gift off in my yard, bring it on!

 

 

 

To read more about Oldenburg, check this out:

https://www.artsy.net/artist/claes-oldenburg

 

 

A Bierstadt Moment

The Mattatuck has several wonderful exhibits right now, calling for your attention.

Alex Katz, The Green Cap, 1985, Whitney Museum of America Art, New York; Purchase with funds from the Print Committee_MED.jpg 2014-02-25 15.42.33

 

 

 

 

Alex Katz works from the Whitney, with my favorite–the self portrait on aluminum, standing up center gallery.  Isn’t he a charmer?

 
Rhythm in Blues 2013 14 x 11 inches_LR.jpg

The contemporary photo-realist landscape paintings by Charles Yoder are the perfect compliment to the wonderful Albert Bierstadt show.  Yes, Yoder works from photographs, then blows up the image in oil.

Moonlight.  Shadows.  Eerily beautiful.  Familiar.  Other-worldly.  Meditative.  Awe-inspiring.

To be awe-inspiriing was one of the goals 175 years ago for Hudson River School painters like Bierstadt, and this exhibit is about how he used photography as inspiration, too.  Hunting for good locations and images for his brothers’ photography business (they made and sold “3D” stereoscope images), he would often paint the scene, in his burgeoning Romantic mode.  These paintings are from his New England period, while he was in his late 20s and early 30s, before the great and huge Western US images that made him so famous.

I think he’s already yearning for the West.  Here’s my art history moment for the day, shared during my visit with the Mattatuck curator Cynthia Roznoy in our catch-up chat.  The show features two paintings of one location, very exacting as you can see.  One was painted in 1862, the other 1868.  So during and before the Civil War.

AB

Albert Bierstadt, Mt Ascutney from Claremont, NH, 1862

 

AB_CT river valley_unframed.jpg

Albert Bierstadt, Connecticut River Valley, Claremont, NH, 1868

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The wall label for the 1862 work says its motivation was to show what the war was being fought for–the peaceful and plentiful countryside.  For the 1868 painting, the label discusses how the splintered tree was typically used as a symbol for civilization encroaching on the countryside and in this work, also refers to the destruction of the war.  Here’s my New Britain Museum of American Art blog post on the blasted tree symbol.

I wonder if even more is going on with the two paintings.  The earlier painting seems almost wistful in its golden tones, while the post-war work is brighter and more verdant.  Can you see how the 1862 painting has a fence dividing a great swath across the painting from lower right to upper left, which Bierstadt emphasizes even more with sunlight?  The same fence in the 1862 image is in shadow, not nearly so important, or so divisive.  What’s in the nation’s conscious in 1862 is the split, while by 1868, reconstructing unity is paramount.

The mountains in the 1862 painting are forbidding and uncrossable.  I’m projecting that we are facing north, so those mountains block the West, making that mythic place inaccessible.  By 1868, the railroad is being built West, and one year later, the transcontinental railroad will be complete.  Look at how much easier those mountains would be to forge.  As re-unification is happening, so is expansion, a deep identifier in this country’s white history–to face challenges, conquer, and expand; face challenges, conquer, and expand; all the way to the moon and back.

These two paintings, made just 6 years apart, tell that story quietly, side by side, in this beauty of a show.  I hope you can get there to see it.

 

 

Monumental and ordinary

The everyday made monumental, the monumental made small.  That was my small day in big New York.

While the typically bloated Guggenheim show on Futurism may take you there, the Carrie Mae Weems exhibit is the real reason to go.  Known for her photographic commentaries on racism and the debilitating stereotypes of African Americans through American history, this show has several of her masterworks.

 

Her famous series “From Here I Saw What Happened and Cried” is a natural extension of Elizabeth Keckley’s experiences, dramatized yesterday, brought to an incisive and bitter cultural critiqilue.  I knew the series and seeing it as a whole is powerfully painful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its message gets summarized in this one image “Looking in the Mirror,” the first image that introduced me to Weems.

LOOKING INTO THE MIRROR, THE BLACK WOMAN ASKED,; “MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL, WHO’S THE FINEST OF THEM ALL?” THE MIRROR SAYS, “SNOW WHITE, YOU BLACK BITCH, AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT!!”

1987-1988

 
Carrie Mae Weems, Untitled (Woman playing solitaire) (from Kitchen Table Series), 1990

 

 

 

 

 

 

I had no idea the effect the “Kitchen Table” series from 1990 (above is the last image in the series) would have on me.  The Guggenheim has the entire narrative interspersed with all the images.  Each has the interrogation light and the table.  What’s on the table tells the story that mimics the written narrative’s words.

We go on a novelistic journey with the heroine, while Weems dissects a relationship–its rise, flowering, and decline–and the way community helps restore the heroine to hero status, after it’s demise.  Weems takes the ordinary, the everyday joys and pains, and monumentalizes them.  Don’t miss the chance to see this one.

When I left the exhibit, my chest literally hurt.  What better place for a healing balm than the beauty of The Frick?

In exchange for the jewel-like exhibit from The Mauritius, The Frick has responded in kind, sending its most famous works, including all three Vermeers, to Holland.  Hmmm. I thought Mr. Frick specified no loans, and The Frick was notorious for refusing to participate in the Vermeer exhibition that brought together all his other works.

Well, whatever.

If you know the collection, then you’ll enjoy seeing how the paintings are rearranged.  We now get a delicious room of Whistler’s, filled with works I had heard about but not seen.  This gallery is worth the trip alone.  Thank you, touring works!

But there’s more.

The focused show of Renaissance bronzes bring the monumental down to miniature, making them all the more impressive to my eye.  Not only can you walk all the way around the pieces, but you can get in close, study the details.

How does that rearing horse not fall over?  Hercules greatest feat may be defying gravity, in the model by Antonio Susini, who copies the original by his master Giambologna. Surely, Bernini studied these models or the fully-scaled sculptures.

Giambologna, Rape of Sabine Women, 1574-1582

Bernini, Hades and Persephone, 1621-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

Yes, I’m geeking out on you again.  Makes me want to go do some homework on Mr. Bernini!

The curators comment about Giambologna’s “vibrant syncopation of contour and form.”  Yes!  Bernini might have learned a thing or two from him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
It was time for me to go downtown.

After grabbing my favorite lemon peel pizza at Keste, I finally got to see Michael Urie in “Buyer and Cellar.”  He’s leaving the show next month to tour it, so you may want to get over to Barrow Street to see him while you can.  His over-the-top energy suits this outrageously plotted show about the coming together of a little man and the monumental Barbra Steisand.  The play is full of laughs, some at the expense of stardom, most at the absurdities of people just trying to make it through life.

In the play, Barbra doesn’t know what to do with a Sunday afternoon. I don’t have that problem.  Even without all my stops today, Washington Square Park would have been enough on this glorious, faux-spring day.  There were the men playing chess, the protesters, the hippie guitar player, the black dudes tumbling, the pianist wrapped in his coat, scarf, and hat, the blue-haired girl walking a dog, by shuffling along on her 8″ black and white, zig zag, platform-heeled boots, the pyramid of bodies getting their picture taken.

We are all monumental in our tiny universes, intersecting at unexpected moments.  It’s all there to see, in the park, as well as in the museum and the theater.

Photos of the day:

Central Park

Central Park

Park Avenue Letting Off Steam

Park Avenue
Letting Off Steam

 

Handle with Care

The non-football-loving Jews were all at “Handle with Care” to see Carol Lawrence in a role a long way from Maria in “West Side Story.”  Cheekbones and sparkling eyes intact, Lawrence plays the dead grandma from Israel, whose body gets lost in Virginia (don’t ask).  Okay, we see her alive in flashbacks from the day before.

Despite the presence, or loss, of the dead body, this is one delightful, sweet, thoughtful dramedy.  It really doesn’t have to be handled with care.  It reflects on whether we/the universe is guided by random chaos or a master plan, free will or fate.  With a very light touch, we consider how to handle the people in our lives with care, no matter the philosophical underpinning.

The same can be contemplated about the ‘fresh’ piece pictured below, now at the Museum of Modern Art.  Although the exhibit of Ileana Sonnabend’s collection centers on a controversial Robert Rauschenberg combine, my interest went elsewhere.  The combine with its stuffed eagle is a beastly ugly piece, which the Sonnabend estate donated to MoMA to avoid the taxes on its $65 million worth.

2013-12-22 13.46.48How much more fun to contemplate the juxtaposition of materials of Giovanni Anselmo’s Untitled (Eating Structure) from 1968.  So we have  forever granite plinth with a temporal head of lettuce, strapped to the stone with wire.  When the lettuce wilts, the small stone on top of it falls off.  Well, I looked and looked for that stone.  Shouldn’t it be obvious?

I asked one, two, then three guards.  Where’s the stone?  The third explained.  This time, the wilted lettuce slipped out of the wire and fell on top of the stone, hiding it.  Aah, I get it now.  A bit of the chance element.  They won’t touch the lettuce until tomorrow, when the art handler will replace the head.  So you tell me:  master plan or random chaos?  Regardless, handle with care!

2013-12-22 13.58.54For a long time, I watched the 1972 piece by Janis Kounellis, Inventing on the Spot, originally commissioned by Ballet Rouses.  The painting on the wall has snippets of Stravinsky’s Pulcinella, played by the violinist until he tires and improvised by the ballerina. 2013-12-22 13.43.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013-12-22 13.44.11

 

 

A mesmerizing act of free will, handled with subtlety and care, plus an experience for the senses–a synesthesia–that literally reverberates throughout the exhibition.

 

To get a sense of it, check out my little video:

I spent a lot of  time with the divinely silly William Wegman video Stomach Song from 1970-1.  You know, he of the witty Weimaraner photos.  Here, he makes facial expressions with his chest and belly.  The sound track is his body-face speaking, then singing a song.  You don’t have to believe me…just take a look at the video.

So as you continue through this holiday season, whether along a master plan or swinging with freedom and chaos of it all, handle it with care, joy, and if at all possible, a laugh!

Elizabeth Okie Paxton

As you may know, I’ve been devoting my research energies to an artist named Elizabeth Okie Paxton.  So little is known about her, and only 4 works are in public collections.  I have been focusing on a messy, feminine, sensual painting called The Breakfast Tray, made about 1910.

For those of you who can, there’s a great opportunity to see the painting coming up.  Normally in a private collection, it’s emerging into the Art Institute of Chicago in “Art and Appetite,” an exhibit running from November 12, 2013 – January 27, 2014.

Another work you can see:
William J. McCloskey. Wrapped Oranges, 1889.

If you are able to go, let me know how The Breakfast Tray looks in a grand museum!

 

Beauty here and there

Since I’m steeping myself in all things British (while training to be a docent at the Yale Center for British Art), I went to the William Kent exhibit at the Bard Gallery.  Kent started out as a painter, and studying in Italy put him close to all those wealthy Brits on a Grand Tour.

So he took up interior design and architecture, working in an Anglo-Palladian style, to help his patrons bring a bit of old world Europe home with them.   In other words, he brought an Italian style to British soil, almost ubiquitous in homes and gardens.  His style was called Georgian, named for all those George’s who were King.

This console table from Houghton Hall will give you some idea of the decorative arts style.  The lions show up on the British Royal Arms and are a symbol of power and courage, as well as knightly virtue.  The console lion is surrounded by cornucopias of fruit and flowers, showing wealth and plenty.  Of course, the blue marble slab on top is rare and precious.  This table really demonstrates the British sense of itself during its empire-building years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kent’s garden designs are pretty darn charming and lasting, having innovated the idea of the ‘wilderness’–so much more natural than those geometric gardens of Baroque France.  A hundred years or so later, Jane Austen would place a pivotal Pride and Prejudice scene in a “pretty sort of little wilderness.”2013-10-13 12.09.03

I found this drawing of Kent really endearing.  “Kent at his Desk” was sketched by Dorothy  Boyle, Countess of Burlington, made after 1720.  It suggests his comfortable relationship with aristocracy.

How’s yours?  If you want more practice, head across the ocean and over to New York Historical Society, just 9 short blocks away.

 

Jeannette Ovington

George Healy portrait of Jeannette Ovington, 1887

The  beauty of “Beauty’s Legacy” refers to more than just the physical; beauty was moral and social, too.  Each exhibit portrait tells a story.  Come on one of my tours to hear a few. Meet a charmer of Bob Ingersoll painted by my girl Lilly Martin Spencer, learn some weird fashion trends, and see miniatures of “notorious women” (aka women novelists).

Then if you’re so bold, you can check out NYHS’s recreation of the 1913 Armory show.  Patrons of the works in “Beauty’s Legacy” would have been shocked!  But all that investment in beauty and luxury and excess and opulence couldn’t last in the face of modernity.  Quite a story to explore!

Henri Matisse, Blue Nude, 1907

 

Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, 1912

Some things that never change and those that do

On the Edward Hopper tour in Greenwich Village, I got to see some of the places where he and Jo created their lives.  He lived in the same apartment on The Row across from Washington Square for over forty years, and Jo moved in with him after they married.

Built in the 1830s, the creme de la creme of New York society lived there.  It was the site of the Henry James novel.  A hundred years later, Hopper moves in to the fourth floor walk up with a shared toilet.  In the 1950s, the landlord tried to kick him out.  They went to court, and Hopper won.  New York real estate is tough.  No indication that they ever got a private loo.

2013-09-15 11.25.30My architectural favorite on today’s tour wasn’t connected to the Hopper’s at all.  Robert Deforest, President of the Met Museum, moved from The Row to 10th Street.  You can see how he was inspired be East Indian motifs in this elaborately carved wooden window corbels.  Built in the 1880s and named one of the ten most beautiful homes in America,  NYU has now gutted the interior, so little remains of the Indian craftsmanship.  Sigh.2013-09-15 11.25.38
Worse was the famous Tenth Street Studio building, torn down and replaced by a ’50’s modernist apartment building.  It was this tear down, as well as Penn Station, that led to forming the Landmark’s Commission.

Across the street is what is left of Gertrude Whitney’s Studio Club, in which even the reclusive Hopper partic2013-09-15 12.00.34ipated.  She assembled eight townhouses and the rear stables into exhibition space celebrating living American artists and their current work.  All that’s left is the patriotic, streamlined eagle above the doorway, the staircase, and the fireplace, which is a piece of art in itself.

 

The stables next door?  The sign was painted for a movie.

So in this city that’s always changing, today we celebrated an artist who doggedly stayed the same–despite the discomforts of his home and marriage and in the face of art trends that turned in a very different direction.
2013-09-15 15.00.50
I saw another example of this juxtaposition at NYU’s Institute of Fine Arts.  Lynda Benglis has four works there.  Look at the contrast between her famous latex pours from the late 1960s and the 1904 classically-inspired mansion that houses the art history doctoral program.  What a place to take a class, as you can see in this slide show.

Invalid Displayed Gallery

 

My day wrapped with a new opera of Jane Austen’s Persuasion, my favorite of her novels. Some things never change, like the poignant charm of this Austen story, which worked fairly nicely as an opera.

Herb & Dorothy 50×50

When I led tours at the Delaware Art Museum as a docent, we received a gift of 50 conceptual and minimalist works collected by Herb and Dorothy Vogel.  A beautiful documentary about Herb and Dorothy told the story of how a postal worker and Brooklyn public librarian were able to amass a world famous art collection.  If you haven’t seen it, I recommend you rush to it.  So inspiring!

Poster 50X50

 

 

 

Now a follow up documentary is being released.  It looks at the gift the Vogels made to each of the 50 states.  50 Works for 50 states.  One museum in each state got the gift.  In this trailer for the new film, you’ll hear my voice about 22 seconds in and then see a glimpse of my public tour they filmed.  Apparently, more is in the film.

I hope you’ll catch a screening–opening at New York’s IFC Center on September 13 and Real Art Ways in Hartford on October 4!  I can hardly wait.

Spare and Elegant

2013-08-17 11.02.53

A room at the Hyde

The Hyde Collection is one of those mansion museums where the owners knew they were forming a museum collection.  The rooms and collection merge in function and display.  Personally, I wouldn’t mind staying in the guest bedroom with the Winslow Homer drawing overhead.

 

Georgia O’Keeffe
Petunias
1924

 

I made the trip to the Adirondack’s to see their Georgia O’Keeffe show.  She and Stieglitz spent a lot of time at Lake George, before it was a tourist trap.  While not a huge fan of hers, I really was taken with this early work.  Through the small exhibit, organized thematically, we see her find a confident voice of abstraction.  A large, extreme close of a jack-in-the-pulpit over the course of four canvasses becomes a line in a plane.

What I was taken with were not the flowers but the leaves.  Stunning studies of line in somber color, spare and elegant.  Her series of trees were evocative, full of personality, that the cell phone tour described a couple of times as cruciform.  I suppose the disappeared chestnut tree is a martyr of sorts.

Modern Nature: Georgia O'Keeffe and Lake George

Georgia O’Keeffe
The Chestnut Grey
1924

The landscapes from the early 1920s were simplified into shapes that could be hung vertically and become wholly abstract.  I strongly preferred the “representational” horizontals, moody and stormy and quiet and seasonal.

Georgia O’Keeffe
Lake George
1922

Thinking of O’Keeffe, what’s a woman to do?  Leave Stieglitz and go West, find a different palette, carve her own forms.

What’s a 46 year old star of the New York City Ballet to do?  Have four male choreographers create duets for her.  These four new dances, some moments sublime, others a miss, each from this past year, are premiering at Jacob’s Pillow.

What worked best was the spare and elegant.  No curtain or sets, no elaborate costumes.  Instead the focus was on bodies, space, and music.  I love that!

So Whelan is finding a new vocabulary for her body (contemporary dance vs ballet), one that is a little too grindingly Philip Glass for me.  But power to her.

In a society that all too easily throws away older woman, how healing to witness two women who continually find ways to reinvent.

Amazing skies

“Art is a subtle essence.  It is not a thing of surfaces, but a moving spirit.”–George Inness

Although I came to the Clark Art Institute for the Winslow Homer exhibit, which is wonderful, I lost my breath in a room of George Inness paintings.  For a fleeting moment, I had the room to myself.

The gallery turned into a meditation on the seasons (see the slide show).  I thought of how a room of Mark Rothko color field paintings now seemed obvious in their appeal to spirit. Here, Inness is quieter.  You have to seek him out.  He doesn’t call out to you, “Notice me!”

autumn-in-montclair-jpg

Image 1 of 6

Instead, I seized the moment to feel his intent.  As a Swedenborgian, Inness believed spirit/god was all around, and “as above, so below.”  Swedenborg was certainly esoteric, but turning my mind off for those few seconds, I got it.

Then in came the other visitors, and the paintings re-entered their frames and hung on the walls again.

The big sky of the new musical Bridges from Madison County also transported me out of  the theater.  The space at the Williamstown Theatre Festival is so huge that the enormity of the Iowa landscape has been captured.  A lone tree against seemingly endless fields and sky that changed with the mood of the story.  The sunset and starry night sky put me right onto that farm porch.

I don’t know how often out-of-town tryouts get a Broadway stage before the tryout has even started, but I get it about this show.  Everything about it is pitch perfect.  The book by Marsha Norman and score by Jason Robert Brown are so tender.  Elena Shaddow is the part of Francesca.   Kelli O’Hara has already been announced for Broadway, and it’s not that she isn’t wonderful.  But she’s more Meryl Streep (from the movie) than Francesca. Stevan Pasquale as Robert is more in his skin than in Far From Heaven.  And their voices worked really well together, turning the histrionics of the book and movie into something more operatic, sensual, and immersive.

How I prefer a simple story about a family and a passion to that of a transvestite wailing about kinky boots.  The end is so quiet, so poignant, so lovely, so memorable.  How could the Broadway show be any better?

Out of the theater, a cold, driving rain soaked me.  Eventually I drove away fromf the storm, and as sun broke through the dark clouds onto the verdant Berkshire hills, a rainbow thickly pushed up from the ground to the sky.

Another transcendent moment in a day of land, clouds, light, voices, and spiritual beauty.

Beautiful Brutality

For my Revolution and Napoleonic Politics class, we have studied 3 artists: Jacques Louis David, Antonio Canova, and Francisco Goya.  Goya really went to the dark side with his paintings, and particularly his prints, which were made for private use or limited production as series.

The most famous series are Los Caprichos (The Caprices) from 1799 and The Disasters of War, published well after Goya’s death, in 1863.  Only then was the Spanish world safe enough to endure Goya’s critique.  Both show the brutal, the superstitious, and the crude, as well as the senselessness of the abuse of power in whatever form.

Several of my classmates work at the Museum of Modern Art, which surprisingly holds both these series plus the lesser known Los Proverbias, printed in 1904.  The prints came to MoMA as part of a larger gift of illustrated books, and all three are in immaculate condition.  The prints are luscious in tone, almost sensuous in saturated ink.

Francisco Goya
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
Los Caprichos
1799

 

But they can be pretty hard to look at.  So why was I so excited to get to see them in person?  Well, I guess I want to seize every opportunity to see original works of art, even when they are unpleasant.  This exposure is one of the joys of being in New York.

 

This is probably the most famous image from any of the series.

 

You can see why he inspired the Surrealists.

 

As our professor noted, Goya could make the most beautiful, “Academic” body, even when displayed in such horror.  That juxtaposition and their timelessness are what make the works relevant today.

Camera Obscura

Thank you to my friend Penny, who reminded me how much I love the public art at Madison Square, just about my favorite park in the city.

Bird rearSo with the temperature hovering near 50 degrees, I decided to walk over today to see what there is to see.  You can’t miss the huge bird made out of gigantic nails.  You can see the construction pretty clearly from this picture of the rear (you can also double click it to enlarge it).  The front of the bird is in the slide show below.

People were much more attracted to this obvious piece of art, juxtaposing the manmade and the natural, nails and bird, that to that little, white, round canister, sitting by its lonesome.

Camera Obscura ext 1

 

You  can probably see why.  The door to the canister is open in this shot.  I liked the minimalism of it.  Penny had told me what to look for, so I wonder if I would have wandered over if she hadn’t.

I’m so glad she did!

The canister is an art installation by Sandra Gibson and Louis Recorder, two film artists.  It’s a camera obscura, the precursor to today’s camera.  A camera obscura works the same way the eye does.  By creating a darkened chamber, with a hole to admit light, an image is projected upon the chamber wall, upside down.

Then artists like Vermeer, reportedly, could trace the outline of the projection to get proportionately accurate buildings, landscapes, rooms, etc.

This installation is small, and the day was moody.  The sun kept going behind clouds, then reemerging, which made the projection ever changing.  The artists said they wanted to “do a film piece without technology,” according to the docent, who let us in and monitored how long we could stay.  I would say the results are mesmerizing, like a good film.

The docent pointed out hard to see changes in the scene–cars going by, pedestrians, the traffic light changing from red to green.  None of those details turned out in my pictures, but the results of the famous Flatiron Building look suprisingly similar to Edward Steichen’s atmospheric 1905 photograph (below right), only upside down and bent where the wall met the floor.

Camera Obscura Flatiron BldgSteichen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The graininess is similar anyway.  I took a few pictures to show the effects of the changing light, which you can catch in the slide show below.  I think they’re eerily beautiful.

Of course, there’s also the mind-bending idea of a camera inside a camera.  I’ll leave you to ponder that one…

bird-front

Image 1 of 14